SonsofArachne
Arachnoangel
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2017
- Messages
- 961
If the Indian species are listed, and they likely will be, then P.rufilata will be one of them.What does this mean for P.rufilata? Will they be put on this list soon as well?
If the Indian species are listed, and they likely will be, then P.rufilata will be one of them.What does this mean for P.rufilata? Will they be put on this list soon as well?
Please go back and read through the pages of posts to understand why this is wrong and can't/won't happen.So it is like selling waterbottles at fairs. You can't sell waterbottles but, you can sell toothpicks for a dollar each and each toothpick comes with a free bottle of water.
Breeding loans are not fine. If you are gifting a male to someone than yes, if you expect spiderlings in return that is not fine.Breeding loans are fine. Trading one for another spider seems pretty iffy. Giving one away for free is also fine.
The FAQ sheet they put out after the decision stated that loans were okay. I also emailed the contact listed on the decision paper for clarification and they stated that a loan with offspring given back in return was fine as long as money was not involved.Breeding loans are not fine. If you are gifting a male to someone than yes, if you expect spiderlings in return that is not fine.
@advan Am I reading the ESA fact page wrong? It seems breeding loans via shipping your male/female to the breeder and receiving it and your portion of said offspring is not a violation and does not require a permit.Breeding loans are not fine. If you are gifting a male to someone than yes, if you expect spiderlings in return that is not fine.
Only now have I noticed this part...what sort of documentation? Breeding papers?Documentation of such an activity should accompany shipment."
I would imagine sending and receiving party contact info, species and sex w/terms of loan. Something simple just showing whats going on should it be stooped and inspected.Only now have I noticed this part...what sort of documentation? Breeding papers?
You are probably correct, but I think it's most likely for the best that we dissect this all now so that we know we can be above board on transactions so that there isn't as much confusion when a year from now someone asks "so can I X with my P. ornata?" we can give a definitive yes or no with proper reasoning and advise on how they can legally go about their business. Better to be above board and protect the hobby from further scrutiny. The fewer bad shipments there are the less likely there is a chance they will get seen which means better things (or at least will hopefully stave off worse things) for the hobby in general imho.I'm starting to think we're over-thinking this. FWS budget has been cut a number of times including the last budget. I seriously doubt if they're going to be chasing down every breeding loan to make sure everything was done perfectly correct. I'm not a breeder, so I'm not risking anything, but I still don't think they're going to form a special pokie task force to check every trade, breeding loan, etc. Now, that being said, I would still advise against selling them - that would likely bring trouble down on your head.
I agree with this, but there are many conflicting statements on this thread and some make it seem like the moment you make a mistake a swat team will break down your door. I made comments about possible loopholes and some people made it seem like I was breaking the law just talking about it. It's getting a little ridiculous.You are probably correct, but I think it's most likely for the best that we dissect this all now so that we know we can be above board on transactions so that there isn't as much confusion when a year from now someone asks "so can I X with my P. ornata?" we can give a definitive yes or no with proper reasoning and advise on how they can legally go about their business. Better to be above board and protect the hobby from further scrutiny. The fewer bad shipments there are the less likely there is a chance they will get seen which means better things (or at least will hopefully stave off worse things) for the hobby in general imho.
Actually you probably could get away with it as long as you kept it quiet, but I wouldn't want to find out the hard way that I'm wrong.Honestly though, what's to stop people from selling these breeds of spider? The people at FedEx aren't going to know xD
So if you have a sac you can’t sell the slings in your state without a breeders license and documentation? I’m not 100% understanding this I have two of the species I purchased and I bred one before August 30th on breeders loan in my state so am I stuck raising all the slings I have?It will have the opposite effect.
Right now captive stock is so readily available and inexpensive that importing or smuggling such species makes absolutely no sense, its just not monetarily worth the effort and risk.
However, in a decade, when hobby stock begins to dwindle, it will open a whole new, now lucrative avenue for smugglers.
IMO its a very backwards law that will do exactly the opposite of its intention.
So sadAn extremely uneducated and reactive bit of legislation.
Captive bred stock and breeding does nothing negative for the endangered animals in India....in fact, it takes the pressure off those species from a hobby standpoint.
you can sell them only within your state...its a violation to sell across state lines.It’s sad they want to extinguish this genus
So if you have a sac you can’t sell the slings in your state without a breeders license and documentation? I’m not 100% understanding this I have two of the species I purchased and I bred one before August 30th on breeders loan in my state so am I stuck raising all the slings I have?