Paul Osullivan
Arachnosquire
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
- Messages
- 108
Hey Ooya! I really enjoyed reading your blog on your website and it's nice that you want to educate the hobbyists of Japan about Hysterocrates species very well done! You seem to be accurate in the gigas/ crassipes comparisons and you have seen the subtle differences at the various life stages between the two species. There are a few more small distinguishing features between the two species (attatched below) that you may want to add, to add futher accuracy to your identifications. Also in H. crassipes, Pocock describes - "palp tarsus more tumid above at base" when compared to other species. I haven't photographed this in detail but the palp tarsus in H. crassipes does appear more tumid/ swollen at it's base when compared to gigas (seen in the picture also). I will add a clearer photo of this soon, but heres some other characteristics if you wanted to educate further..
Also, the lower sigilae in H. crassipes is very distinctly larger over the one above.
Your Hercules female does look very impressive and your blog about the Hercules spider is quite interesting also. I had to translate it, but I was able to understand it. I would add as I believe on the eyes it's the area in front of the eyes that's most important and the layout of the eye's themselves are variable in species. So the clypeus area in front of the eyes is the area of importance in it's shape and space from the eyes and possibly the hair length/ arrangement covering the chelicerae. I'm not sure if you have thae same species as me, although some features do look alike.
I do have to mention I haven't had my spiders "officially identified" although this I plan to do soon. I have based the identification on the evedence I have obtained in my 6 years of research. I did think that both your males look very different to mine and you have said yourself this is "variability within the species". But I would say both your males were different species to mine as there is much difference in it's appearance and the bulbs also look different which is a stable marker to rely upon..
On the larger female, prehaps you could take some photos of leg 4's meta-tarsus and compare to laticeps and hercules to see which one it looks alike too, as they are both distinctly different..
I have taken some pictures of the tarsus of the palp in Gigas and Crassipes. The difference is very subtle, but noticeable and this is another good bit of work by Pocock and how he has noticed and documented the tarsus being slightly swollen of the palp in Crassipes. (These two spider moults were as close to exactly the same size at 6 inches)
Also, the lower sigilae in H. crassipes is very distinctly larger over the one above.
Your Hercules female does look very impressive and your blog about the Hercules spider is quite interesting also. I had to translate it, but I was able to understand it. I would add as I believe on the eyes it's the area in front of the eyes that's most important and the layout of the eye's themselves are variable in species. So the clypeus area in front of the eyes is the area of importance in it's shape and space from the eyes and possibly the hair length/ arrangement covering the chelicerae. I'm not sure if you have thae same species as me, although some features do look alike.
I do have to mention I haven't had my spiders "officially identified" although this I plan to do soon. I have based the identification on the evedence I have obtained in my 6 years of research. I did think that both your males look very different to mine and you have said yourself this is "variability within the species". But I would say both your males were different species to mine as there is much difference in it's appearance and the bulbs also look different which is a stable marker to rely upon..
On the larger female, prehaps you could take some photos of leg 4's meta-tarsus and compare to laticeps and hercules to see which one it looks alike too, as they are both distinctly different..
I have taken some pictures of the tarsus of the palp in Gigas and Crassipes. The difference is very subtle, but noticeable and this is another good bit of work by Pocock and how he has noticed and documented the tarsus being slightly swollen of the palp in Crassipes. (These two spider moults were as close to exactly the same size at 6 inches)
Last edited: