- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,351
It was not originally stated that it was your 'opinion'.
Thanks for clearing it up though.
Thanks for clearing it up though.
Joe, it is in your signature?? "I do not think the sac will be good".It was not originally stated that it was your 'opinion'.
Thanks for clearing it up though.
I agree with that, I also hardly EVER do Breeding loans....to much can go wrong LOL!!rob, it was more that a bunch of ppl "sided" with you and joe got accused of, like, some sort of personal motivation for the correction.
because a lot of ppl don't actually understand the way tarantula reproduction works breeding loans can go awry and such like. it is a bit of a sore spot with me (you can search the review section and figure out why) and i just wanted to make sure everyone knew how they actually work
in point of fact, if you had a female tarantula that was just about to lay a dud eggsac you could mate her with a male and get viables out of it. the female just holds the males sperm separately, in a quiescent state, until she is actually laying the eggs. then the sperm gets mixed with her eggs and juice, gets activated, and fertilizes the eggs. it is the crux of how tarantulas can do deferred reproduction and is freaking amazing
OpinionI do not think this sac will be good, she laid it in Less than 40 days.
I can see what you are saying......but it wasn't meant to be a fact.Opinion
Fact
What you're doing here is indicating that the fact she laid in < 40 days empirically states the sac won't be good.
In other words, you're using the < 40 days thing as a fact regarding viability of the sac.
What we're saying is that the amount of time it takes the spider to drop the sac has absolutely no impact on whether the sac will be good or not.
They all died at first instars.Wow. One of the most entertaining threads I've ever read on this forum.
Hey Rob, any news on the sac?
hay rob big fan i sent you a privel emal plas respondI do not think this sac will be good, she laid it in Less than 40 days.