- Joined
- Aug 7, 2002
- Messages
- 649
Not yet. I just know the the real "insignis" lack the xmas pattern on their abdomens, so when these came in from Europe last year, I questioned their validity to be real "insignis". From years back, in my opinion, the real "insignis" female are much stockier than "machala" females.@xenesthis I've read that the 'cf. insignis' is most likely sp. 'machala'. Have you seen any similarities of the two if you own both species?
My apologies, I think I worded my previous question wrong. I know that the real insignis we have now, the one lacking the Christmas tree pattern, is not the machala, I meant the one that we labeled cf. insignis for a while.Not yet. I just know the the real "insignis" lack the xmas pattern on their abdomens, so when these came in from Europe last year, I questioned their validity to be real "insignis". From years back, in my opinion, the real "insignis" female are much stockier than "machala" females.
Don't know. I'm growing up some now and we shall see the differences if any.My apologies, I think I worded my previous question wrong. I know that the real insignis we have now, the one lacking the Christmas tree pattern, is not the machala, I meant the one that we labeled cf. insignis for a while.
Got it, thanks!Don't know. I'm growing up some now and we shall see the differences if any.
zoomi need help
who can told this phamphobeteus sp?
Requests to identify (or confirm) a tarantula's species or variation must be posted to the appropriate gallery. Please see this thread for instructions: How to Request Species or Sex Identification.i need help
who can told this phamphobeteus sp?