- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Messages
- 1,781
Hi Brendan,Aviculariinae said:,Sorry steve if it sounded like i was singling you out, but that was not my intention,i meant it ina general response.
No probs, I understand
No, not my term, strikers is a correct term for the long spiniform (and often filliform distally) bristles that rub against the lyra. There may be other terms for this character as well. Strikers comes from Raven 1985 and is used to cover those bristles on all mygale families that possess them (some diplurids, some nemesiids, some barychelids and the theraphosids). Whether or not he coined the term himself, the term is indeed now valid due to its use in such a monumental and constantly referenced work.Now am just curious is the word "strikers" a term that is often used in describing the bristles,or is this a word you like to use yourself?
Well, even moreso in the Selenocosmiinae. An interesting point is that these two families possess subspecies, which immediately sets alarm bells ringing.Is it just me or does it seem that Selenocosmiinae is nearly as mixed up as the Aviculariinae subfamily.
SureAutapomorphies! Care to explain?
An autapomorphy is a derived character (from the primitive/plesiomorphic state) that is diagnostic to the group of animals in question. The group of animals must be declared before deciding a character is autapomorphic. This is because in a lower group of animals (say genus level) the presence of a character may only be found in one species of that genus. It is a derived character (apomorphic) and is autapomorphic to that one species. However, perhaps at subfamily level several species may possess this character and it is no longer autapomorphic. Clear as mud
Cheers,
Steve