correct :clap:Photoshop.
I like the set up what did you use to get the fog going on?
I hate to have to reveal this monster...
![]()
Those are inches. Over 30. 'nuff said.
:liar:![]()
id be more prepared to accept the rather simpler explanation that this spider has a 27cm legspan and a 43 mm carapace neither of which are unknown in blondis.What's funny about these threads is that they are all irrelevant. Unless you get a verified size by a reliable third party, all pictures are void.
I have a 12" ruler that is really 6" long but miniaturized. If I stick that bad boy beside my A. geniculata female, you'd think I had a 16" specimen. Perceived sizes can be manipulated with Photoshop and perspective shots as well.
i never see these as size contests, to my mind its a simple verification of how big a theraphosa can get which i find is something i like to know.Beautiful specimen. COngratulations!!
Although i disapprove these size contests![]()
id be more prepared to accept the rather simpler explanation that this spider has a 27cm legspan and a 43 mm carapace neither of which are unknown in blondis.
a 6 inch ruler feigning a 12 inch ruler would give a spider almost 2 feet across and nobody is going to fall for that. of course that could be a 5.5 inch blondi on that false ruler but the proportions on that animal suggest a big one.
Satisfied with the size, but it looks like a T. apophysis to me. So Rob's Zila is safe for the worlds largest blondi.Agreed. That's an extreme difference, however, dimensions can be falsified by a few centimetres and still seem plausible.
I'm satisfied with the OP's proofs though.
Satisfied with the size, but it looks like a T. apophysis to me. So Rob's Zila is safe for the worlds largest blondi.
She was a monster. I'm so sorry for your loss.
I to have owned, and do own several of each, though I admit none as big as your girl was.Hi Matthias,
It is actually a T.blondi. not T.apophysis. Apophysis has a very slender build, nothing like blondi's, i know I have had many. T.apophysis dimensions are very different, it always surprises me how people keep mixing them up.
As for Rob's Zilla, well I have yet to see anything other than a video...
Cheerio
I have to say that regardless of whose is bigger or anything else - you had yourself a very beautiful girl there and I'm truly sorry for your loss.Hi Matthias,
It is actually a T.blondi. not T.apophysis. Apophysis has a very slender build, nothing like blondi's, i know I have had many. T.apophysis dimensions are very different, it always surprises me how people keep mixing them up.
As for Rob's Zilla, well I have yet to see anything other than a video...
Cheerio
I to have owned, and do own several of each, though I admit none as big as your girl was.
I won't argue. I will only explain my thinking.
Yes T. apophysis are more slender than T. blondi but I would not say "very" compaired to anything else. For a >11" animal I would have expected the legs to be even bigger for a blondi. I've owned blondi with 1cm leg segments that were not close to 11".
That and the oval shape and raised front of the carapace are typical of a T. apophysis. Blondi's are usually rounder and "flatter", at least by the eyes.
As far as I know the only true way to tell the difference is that T. apophysis have stradulating organs on more appendages that T. blondi.
Regardless she was beautiful, and I am sorry for your loss.
I'll let Rob defend Zila's title but I do know there were some official measurements.