yes. this is an old topic. both of you guys being newer to the site i would like to refer you to the search option. I am by no means being a jerk or saying dont post your ideas or questions, but this is one of those dead horse threads. check out these threads for more info and please feel free to hit the search function for any questions you have.Probably that one nobody has, because it's an endangered species
I would think that this is something that is fluid and changes over time.yes. this is an old topic. both of you guys being newer to the site i would like to refer you to the search option. I am by no means being a jerk or saying dont post your ideas or questions, but this is one of those dead horse threads. check out these threads for more info and please feel free to hit the search function for any questions you have.
My thoughts exactly! I also ment to say thanks for posting those other threads! I've been curious about this kinda stuff as well!I would think that this is something that is fluid and changes over time.
Not a lot of further details. I know a biologist who is working with taxonomy of Theraphosidae (descriptions, more than anything). I think he will make some publications, but probably not soon (and is OK, I think things have to be done with calm and accuracy to avoid troubles).That is very interesting (to me anyway) Lorum.. do you have any further details?
Poecilotheria nallamalaiensis is a junior synonym for Poecilotheria formosa.Undescribed species aside, I'd guess something like Poecilotheria nallamalaiensis.
Psalmos are arboreal, so you have arboreals : )Also, the only species of Avicularia we had registered for our country was transfered to Sericopelma. That leave us without any arboreal T registered for México...Also, we have a new undescribed species of Psalmopoeus
Not sure but I guess H. hercules is already extinct? Correct me if I'm wrong.What about H. Hercules? I thought I read noone actually has a real H.Hercules, just a mislabeled Hysterocrates species.
That link appears to refer to Microhexura montivaga, which is a diplurid, not a theraphosid (i.e. not a "tarantula" in the strict sense of the word).Well besides the ones that nobody even knows about, or can't even find, my guess would be these. http://americasroof.com/archives/1664
That link appears to refer to Microhexura montivaga, which is a diplurid, not a theraphosid (i.e. not a "tarantula" in the strict sense of the word).
Here is one of your own threads that tells you it is not a Theraphosidae(tarantula). ClickyReally? I posted about this sometime back, and got the same link from a member on here. I guess the video didnt have enough details about them, and i dont understand all the taxonomy and such enough. Thanks.