- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- Messages
- 652
It sucks that they took your bugs away, but atleast that's all they did. They didn't arrest you or fine you or anything else.
I think everyone here knows its not any of you moderators.I was not referring to any of you as snitches! The feds wouldnt even have to ask any of the mods for ISP's,that they can get from this boards server,and so on. I agree with the laws,its just sometimes they are odd.Mainly on the mantids and millipedes that have been here for years.And the sticks!Sheri said:Arachnoboards does not endorse or encourage any hobbyist to disobey the laws in her/her country in any respect.
We are the largest forum of it's kind on the internet - it is not a surprise that we may be monitored as illegal trade in animals is a lucrative business that often shows little compassion for the animals we care so much about.
Laws that protect our native environments are needed - one need only look at Australia to know why. If there is legislation that prevents you from keeping the animals you have an interest in, I would suggest you pursue that through legal channels and explore what options you may have.
Arachnoboards is not in the business of offering personal information to any agency - we hardly have time to read all the posts much less try to play secret agent.
Amanda said:It sucks that they took your bugs away, but atleast that's all they did. They didn't arrest you or fine you or anything else.
I never suggested not saying anything, I've been very vocal myself on this subject in many different places. However, there is a difference between complaining about illogical regulations and advocating what amounts to ecological terrorism.John J Starr Jr said:RANT AND RAVE ALL YOU LIKE PEOPLE, true change can take place if we OUST 100% of the current government at election time. Please Register and Vote because it is your right and responsibility.
John J Starr Jr
.
Tleilaxu said:Tell them to stop being coweardly and come on here and admit their foul deeds Jeez I am tempted just to buy such bug then let them go on purpose.At least tell them to remburse you the bastards.
Great post.Wade said:OK folks, a few points...
1. Those of you who are suggesting that you want to release stuff just just to stick it to the USDA are not helping matters at all! You are only re-affirming what they already think...that insect hobbyists are a bunch of irresponsible amateurs willfully engaging in criminal activity. You already know they browse these boards, why do you want to make matters worse? Criticizing their actions is one thing, but actually advocating deliberately releasing insects as a form of protest is just not smart at all. Even if you're only joking, I can assure you THEY don't take it that way.
2. Introduced insects DO cause tremendous damage to both agriculture and the ecosystem. Although I think the USDA regs are over-reaching and often unenforceable, they do have a real job to do. At the present time, the USDA defines nearly all exotic insects as being pests. I have a dream that someday there will be an "exceptions" list of large, showy bugs that hobbyists are interested in and have proven to be low-risk that the USDA will deregulate and allow hobbyists to have. Many species of walking sticks, for example, have been in culture for decades and have not become introduced pests and would be good candidates for such a list. However, militant attitudes will prevent that from ever happening.
3. Some seem to believe that this is part of some vast, evil government conspiracy aimed at limiting your rights. Actually, it's more likely part of bureaucratic government's natural desire to grow itself. Nevertheless, the USDA does serve a legitimate purpose, even if busting people for walkingsticks that have been cultured for decades by hundreds, if not thousands of people in this country is a colossal waste of time taxpayer money. You can rant and rave all you like, but it ain't gonna go away. The best you can hope for is change.
Wade
so when a house gets raided, the cops have to pay those folks back for the meth the take, right?Tleilaxu said:At least tell them to remburse you the bastards.
I'm surprised you know how to use the word conjecture, yet have absolutely no idea what it means. Is this quote by you an example of how NOT to use conjecture?? Lots of unprovable and sensantional hyperbole with ZERO facts to back it up... sounds like conjecture to me:John J Starr Jr said:While you have a right to your opinion I believe that some of your statements are conjecture with very little at all to base them on. The sky is blue so there is NOTHING that can be done about the situation makes as much sense as some your statement do.
And then you state this:John J Starr Jr said:Actually humans do far more damge than every single insect on the entire planet does period. THE USDA is filled with many people who in many cases are under educated for their position and that do not allways know what they are doing just like 99_% of the other government agencies that are filled with mostly ladder climbing political folks only intersting in getting ahead and not in what the job is actually for. We the people could do just fine by closing down 99_% of the government starting with the white house and congress. Trust me, most all of us would not miss them a single bit and would not notice a difference except for the money that we would save in taxes.
By your own logic, less regulations make for easier captive breeding efforts, right? What party do you think fights HARDEST against most environmentalist legislation? The Republicans, of course. Whether you agree with the political party or not, the FACT that Republicans tend to vote in favor of less environmentalist agenda, and Democrats tend to vote in FAVOR of more of it, does not bode well for your case. You are ranting and raving that if we installed a 100% Democrat/Green government tomorrow, that all stupid environmental regulations would simply fly out the window, and they'd let us keep whatever we wanted with impunity?? You aren't using your head... your rantings are contradicting themselves.John J Starr Jr said:The only hope for the preservation of any wildlife genetic material is by those of us who are captive breeding because wildlife is doomed to massive extinction unless a dramatic change in our present course is made. Sorry but I do not believe in the current government or any of the agencies below it to do more than typical political grandstanding. Sounds like the left wing and maybe even extreme green left wing would do more to save the wildlife to me in this perspective.
Actually, as written, the regulations don't make any distiction as to whether or not the insect in question could survive here. If it eats any part of a plant, even dead plants, it is considered a potential plant pest, so that cuts out everything but predators. Most of the predators get cut out because they ALSO define pests as anything that might eat a plant pollinator (bees, butterflies etc.) so that eliminates mantids, assassin bugs etc. Fortunately arachnids (except Acari) fall under the jurisdiction of the USFWS and they are mainly concerned with violations of the endangered species act, the lacey act and CITES so the USDA doesn't go after them, even though they would fall under their definition of "potential plant pests".Thoth said:Most of the USDA regs concerning pest insects has some logic behind it even though one may not agree. Basically they want to limit inadvertant introduction of species that will adversely affect the enviroment (mainly negative impact on agriculture). So any species that may survive in the enviroment here is restricted. Since the US has various different climates, sometimes as a result something that has no chances surviving in the wild north of the Mason-Dixon may still be restricted because it will thrive in Florida