- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 11,497
Northern Thailand.
My first time in Bangkok (in 2004) there was a reptile show not far from where I was staying (Imperial Queens Park hotel). I suspect they might have had an Ophiophagus as part of the show. Unfortunately I didn't have time to check it out. When I went back last year the show wasn't there anymore. I probably would have been bothered by the care of the animals anyhow. In 2004 I also rescued a small retic from a crowd of people on a construction site. It was nice (and handle) to see a retic in the "wild" even if it was downtown Bangkok...Northern Thailand.
Man, I resent this attitude. It reeks of absolute negatives. "You cannot do it" "Why" "Because..." This is just irrational. And this shows how people behind the scenes are doing their goddamn best to take people's rights away. We are not talking about a decent permit system here either, which is in place in most European countries for example. No, we are talking about a wide range absolute goddamn ban. Why? Because (as an example) some guy, who happens to have some legal experience and some zoo experience have decided how people should act on their behalf! I am sorry and I am sorry but that's just plain BS. Especially in a country where you have 1.5 guns per person, it is complete BS.Hello,
I cannot post zoo protocols here...several pages, plus a huge binder of info necessary to assure backup supplies of antivenin, backup doctors in event designated specialist is not available, chopper or other transport for victim and additional antivenin; experts to check recent changes in treatment options (venom evolution, etc) and so on; in any event, legalities would prevent such even if time did not (I'm also an attorney, and instinctively consider such things...in my experience, folks tend to pick and choose from such lists). Re legalities - I've participated in the legislative process in several states; the general trend is towards increased regulation, and the consensus among attorneys and responsible gov officials is that the issue will soon be largely settled via laws prohibiting private ownership in most if not all of the USA.
Opinions etc are not relevant here, at least in my view...there is a set, long-established way to deal with venomous bites, and even under the best of circumstances problems can arise. It is unwise to attempt to operate without fully understanding what is involved...hands on responders, while a wonderful source of info and a vital part of the protocol, are just that - a part. Doctors, herpetologists and many others all have a role, and have access to info that is largely unavailable to others.
I strongly advise the 2 prior posters not to rely upon the assumptions they have expressed above.
Those sincerely interested in working with venomous snakes would be well advised to seek a career in herpetology. If that is not possible, I suggest subscribing to the major journals..Copeia, Toxicon, Herpetologica, Journal of Herpetology etc and attending the conferences sponsored by the parent organizations.
Again, I'm not naive, and realize that, in most cases, legislation is the only way to limit the private ownership of venomous snakes (well, bites usually limit it...those that survive a bite almost always go through a rapid "attitude adjustment"!!). Therefore, I'll not continue debating this issue. Best, Frank
Well they are, at least in the democratic part of the world and they always will be. I have an IQ of 141, I was educated as a geneticist/cell biologist in a great university and I have been working with reptiles for most of my life. I know what venom does to organism in extreme detail and via personal experience as I am also a snake bite survivor (no rapid attitude change either!). So I am not going to accept absolute negatives from anyone. If I die doing this, I will die doing what I love doing so know this, we will fight against your bans globally. Try your best!Opinions etc are not relevant here?
This is leaning a lot towards dictatorship imho... I myself will never (hmm, never say never^^) have venomous snakes, coz it's just not allowed here (maybe thanx to people like you...) but also coz i do not think i can handle it like it should be done. But i know some private people who have those wonderful creatures and are very prepared to handle them, with protocols and everything. I really don't see the difference between a zoo or a private keeper? They both need lots of experience and knowledge about the animals, but in the end both can be as prepared as should be. And both can still be tagged and possibly die. But who are you to decide who can do this or not???Hello,
I cannot post zoo protocols here...several pages, plus a huge binder of info necessary to assure backup supplies of antivenin, backup doctors in event designated specialist is not available, chopper or other transport for victim and additional antivenin; experts to check recent changes in treatment options (venom evolution, etc) and so on; in any event, legalities would prevent such even if time did not (I'm also an attorney, and instinctively consider such things...in my experience, folks tend to pick and choose from such lists). Re legalities - I've participated in the legislative process in several states; the general trend is towards increased regulation, and the consensus among attorneys and responsible gov officials is that the issue will soon be largely settled via laws prohibiting private ownership in most if not all of the USA.
Opinions etc are not relevant here, at least in my view...there is a set, long-established way to deal with venomous bites, and even under the best of circumstances problems can arise. It is unwise to attempt to operate without fully understanding what is involved...hands on responders, while a wonderful source of info and a vital part of the protocol, are just that - a part. Doctors, herpetologists and many others all have a role, and have access to info that is largely unavailable to others.
I strongly advise the 2 prior posters not to rely upon the assumptions they have expressed above.
Those sincerely interested in working with venomous snakes would be well advised to seek a career in herpetology. If that is not possible, I suggest subscribing to the major journals..Copeia, Toxicon, Herpetologica, Journal of Herpetology etc and attending the conferences sponsored by the parent organizations.
Again, I'm not naive, and realize that, in most cases, legislation is the only way to limit the private ownership of venomous snakes (well, bites usually limit it...those that survive a bite almost always go through a rapid "attitude adjustment"!!). Therefore, I'll not continue debating this issue. Best, Frank
. o O ( Could we get this guy some elephant tranquilizers, kind of STAT if you would)Man, I resent this attitude. It reeks of absolute negatives. "You cannot do it" "Why" "Because..." This is just irrational. And this shows how people behind the scenes are doing their goddamn best to take people's rights away. We are not talking about a decent permit system here either, which is in place in most European countries for example. No, we are talking about a wide range absolute goddamn ban. Why? Because (as an example) some guy, who happens to have some legal experience and some zoo experience have decided how people should act on their behalf! I am sorry and I am sorry but that's just plain BS. Especially in a country where you have 1.5 guns per person, it is complete BS.
Well they are, at least in the democratic part of the world and they always will be. I have an IQ of 141, I was educated as a geneticist/cell biologist in a great university and I have been working with reptiles for most of my life. I know what venom does to organism in extreme detail and via personal experience as I am also a snake bite survivor (no rapid attitude change either!). So I am not going to accept absolute negatives from anyone. If I die doing this, I will die doing what I love doing so know this, we will fight against your bans globally. Try your best!
I try to keep it very simple. We, the venomous keepers, have an antivenom bank that we pay into, which is a shared source. The bank has our address, the hospital we would go, our family doctor etc. I also have a full coverage insurance so that I won't be a burden on the taxpayer if I get bitten. I also have a folder, with an extended medical protocol to take it to the hospital with me as the doctors are not the most experienced for venomous snake bites.. o O ( Could we get this guy some elephant tranquilizers, kind of STAT if you would)
Najakeeper, you've been talked about behind your back I should mention but anyway. Findi rattled on about protocols though no specifics have been forthcoming. A couple of us here have felt we'd like to hear what protocols or equivalents long time snake keepers such as yourself have in place. Sort of a way for people to put together a handy guide to what all is entailed in keeping hots with both them and the keeper content and safe. Would you be so kind as to put in your 37 cents kroner pesos marks or whatever??
I absolutely disagree. I have my protocols for a bite, and I have antivenom locally covered. I was unaware a prerequisite of keeping hots was owning and/or living at a hospital facility.Freedudmbclxvi - the fact that you would have to go, in the event of being possibly envenomated, to Venom One (or another hospital) in of itself shows that you are not setup at home to take care of a snake (or spider) bite, just that you have available local resources to which to go to for treatment.
Man, I wanted to stay mad and keep ranting with that energy but I just went out to walk with my dog (Yes, I have one of those as well. Objection?) and I saw a toad orgy in the middle of the road. After that view, you just cannot stay mad .Pay attention to the doctor's post.
This subject always gets around to a "the government is taking away my rights" type discussion. I have no interest in such...growing up in the Bronx, during the "bad years" has left me very much a "law and order" type guy. Of course this will open the way to more "dictator" type rantings, but so be it.
If (by chance!) anyone has comments on the subject of the article itself, rather than the debate over private ownership, please post and I'll respond quickly, best, Frank
:laugh::laugh::laugh:... and I saw a toad orgy in the middle of the road. After that view, you just cannot stay mad .
Absolutely agreed. Again, I currently do not keep hot reptiles, but i just completed getting my conditional species permit, which involved inspections of my caging and keeping as well setting up a disaster plan in the event of emergencies. I have zero issues with a permit system, and I think that is a wonderful way to keep the people who would impulse by a dangerous animal from such situations while allowing responsible keepers the ability to keep the animals they love.Najakeeper said:Frank, let me put it this way. I am probably one of the most left wing/liberal guys you can find in these forums. Believe me, I am all for regulations that makes sense and venomous snake keeping, like private firearms ownership, shall be heavily regulated. I hate the idea of an 18 year old idiot, who walks into a reptile show and buys the cool albino Naja kaouthia for 50 bucks to impress his idiot friends. That should be illegal. Yet, if you cannot separate that guy with a person, who goes through the pain of being properly licenced, who pays extra insurance money, who researches and gets ready for years for a hobby that he/she loves then you should not be in a position to influence politicians about civil liberties.
I have missed this one. No mate, I haven't but sound thrilling .Najakeeper, have you read Gerald Durrel's Africa trip where he was lowered into a pit full of Gaboon Vipers at night, as he was about to touch the bottom one of his shoes fell off, and then the lamp went out?