Taking the book for what it was meant to be, a GUIDE for KEEPERS, it is by far the best work out there. NOTHING even comes close.
It is not a text book, or species key. It was written to help people enjoy these wonderful creatures safely.
I love the book for many reasons and have refeared to it as a bible.
But it not infallible so maybe bible is a bad word, See the taxonomic discussion on page 79. I know Stan is often embarrassed abut the G. rosea naming in the second edition but I think it is great example of the turmoil in Arachnid taxonomy and encourages others to do more research.
I have not read the whole book and I had not read the piece on blondi. (I was too busy starring at the picture on 352) Please note the word "tame" was never used nor did he encourage anyone to handle blondi. I have often gotten the impression that Stan doesn't agree with handling for the sake of handling at all. I'm sure he can correct me though:worship: .
Over all it was a great book that was long over due. I am eagerly awaiting the 4th edition some time in the late 2020's
It is not a text book, or species key. It was written to help people enjoy these wonderful creatures safely.
I love the book for many reasons and have refeared to it as a bible.
But it not infallible so maybe bible is a bad word, See the taxonomic discussion on page 79. I know Stan is often embarrassed abut the G. rosea naming in the second edition but I think it is great example of the turmoil in Arachnid taxonomy and encourages others to do more research.
I have not read the whole book and I had not read the piece on blondi. (I was too busy starring at the picture on 352) Please note the word "tame" was never used nor did he encourage anyone to handle blondi. I have often gotten the impression that Stan doesn't agree with handling for the sake of handling at all. I'm sure he can correct me though:worship: .
Over all it was a great book that was long over due. I am eagerly awaiting the 4th edition some time in the late 2020's