- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 510
And this is why I did not want to go down this path.:wall:
Just because people do get addicted to pain killers does not mean going to the hospital to get relief will make you addicted. I've had painkillers after surgery and took the stuff for a few days, did I get addicted? No. Hospitals can do more than prescribe painkillers, they can give you oxygen if you have trouble breathing, steroids when you have bad cramps etc. But hey, if you want to go natural and take a shot of wheatgrass when you can't breathe, knock yourself out!Paper cuts are wounds, do you go to the hospital everytime you get one? Pain killers often do cause dependency. There is a member on these boards that was addicted to painkillers. [JadeSpider85, I believe?]
Homeowners insurance?!! are you kidding me? First of all, you were talking about medical insurance. Second, even if what you say is true about homeowners insurance, going to the hospital or not does not make a difference because according to you, all that matters is the insurance company finding out somehow. Like they've got people waiting at the hospital waiting for you to come in. Homeowners insurance and medical insurance-two very different policies offered by different companies.Yes, they could be bothered. Not honoring the claim and raising your rates could cost you thousands over a life time. Also, often times home owner's insurance will either make you get rid of your animals or deny you coverage. I know a guy that had to surrender his collection of perfectly innocent snakes because he let it slip out that he had them when applying for coverage.
You are paraphrasing what you said. And perhaps you can explain the difference to me? You still haven't provided me with the name of one scientist (preferably one that knows something about T's) that "knows" that T's can't be conditioned and the research he did that led him to that conclusion.I said something along the lines of... "as far as scientists know, tarantulas can't be taught." Very different than what you accuse me of saying.
Why do you keep bringing up the handling example?!! Stan and I referred to examples of defensive T's reacting to an approaching hand. No matter how you want to do it differently- the hand approaches the T. If it reacts defensively the first time, it should do so every time since you say it can't learn anything/be taught/ be conditioned etc. Perhaps you can explain to me how someone can pick up a T in a pinch hold without his hand approaching the T?? Nevermind, I don't want to know your response- I really don't have the patience to go back and forth with you.I said nothing about vibes or sight, what I was saying is that T keepers subconsciously learn the ropes of handling each individual. They don't do the things that caused unpleasent reactions after a while and the T starts appearing docile. Remember, the subconcious mind consists of 90% of the active mind, but then again, what the heck does Sigmund Freud know about the brain?
Where in my response did I say confidence equal over confidence?!! Please read your own words and my response again.It's hard to explain, but in a nut shell, confidence does not equal over confidence.