- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,101
What distinguishes P. antinous from Bolivia and P. cf. 'antinous' from Peru? Are they likely different spdeies? I know most of the antinous in Europe are cf. antinous from Peru.most (all) of the so called "antinous" from iquitos / peru can distinguished from grandis by coloration of the male, thickened femur and morphology of the bulb.
the bulb should also distinguished from P antinous.
What distinguishes P. antinous from Bolivia and P. cf. 'antinous' from Peru? Are they likely different spdeies? I know most of the antinous in Europe are cf. antinous from Peru.
I've a WC P. cf. 'antinous' from Peru (definitely AF) and it's small for a Pampho and has no red hair at all. Is that typical for the Peru variant? Do only the real P. antinous from Bolivia have red setae on the abdomen? Do all antinous have thicker femurs? I can't compare bulbs because mine is female.
I know most of the antinous in Germany are cf. antinous from Peru and don't have red setae.
Yep, you are right, I just spent an hour reading up on it. There are some German forum posts claiming the Bolivian ones are smaller and more skittish... meaning mine is probably from Bolivia after all.On the contrary from what I've read so far the Bolivian antinous are those specimens without or have little setae, while those from Peru possess these hairs. I have to re-check my facts, could be the other way around. But IMO (which amounts to nothing LOL) they are just regional variants, probably separated by a topographical or natural boundary e.g. a river or a mountain range causing some form of divergence. Still important to separate them (e.g. not to cross-breed) to maintain what nature intended them to be and so retain genetic purity.
I'm yet to see something on the subspecies level. This sadly happens to an animal group kept followed closely by people, or have a following composed of hobbyists, enthusiasts or keepers - everything is elevated as a species. I find naming subspecies important as it allows one to connect the dots really by way of associating visible morphological characteristics rather than have multiple taxa bearing different names but look the same, which IMO is more confusing.Yep, you are right, I just spent an hour reading up on it. There are some German forum posts claiming the Bolivian ones are smaller and more skittish... meaning mine is probably from Bolivia after all.
This is all a mess.
I know the intention of this thread wasn't to ask a gajillion questions about Pampho. antinous, but since I am here...
I know there is a lot of controversy regarding the rare and elusive "chicken spider" (Pampho. "arana pollito"? (Sic))...would the "chicken spider" just be considered a different "form(?)" of Pampho. antinous or a sub-species of Pampho. antinous?
I want to do genetic testing on all tarantulas in the hobby, I "just" have to figure out the logistics and the financing.I'm yet to see something on the subspecies level. This sadly happens to an animal group kept followed closely by people, or have a following composed of hobbyists, enthusiasts or keepers - everything is elevated as a species. I find naming subspecies important as it allows one to connect the dots really by way of associating visible morphological characteristics rather than have multiple taxa bearing different names but look the same, which IMO is more confusing.
I want to do genetic testing on all tarantulas in the hobby, I "just" have to figure out the logistics and the financing.
(And the gene used for barcoding (COX1) is a mitochondrial gene, so we will only know the maternal line, but that may help. But I could do a proof of principal and see if I can get workable DNA from a molt, because I'm not harming a spider for this. Now, who wants to pay to have their spider's DNA tested? )
One of the breeders I've seen on FB used to have both P. antinous (Big Black) and P. cf. antinous Peru on his sales list.What distinguishes P. antinous from Bolivia and P. cf. 'antinous' from Peru? Are they likely different spdeies? I know most of the antinous in Europe are cf. antinous from Peru.
I've a WC P. cf. 'antinous' from Peru (definitely AF) and it's small for a Pampho and has no red hair at all. Is that typical for the Peru variant? Do only the real P. antinous from Bolivia have red setae on the abdomen? Do all antinous have thicker femurs? I can't compare bulbs because mine is female.
I know most of the antinous in Germany are cf. antinous from Peru and don't have red setae.
What's the damage?Now, who wants to pay to have their spider's DNA tested?
No clue yet. First I need to see that I can extract DNA from a molt (doing that next week, already talked my lab into trying it), than I need to check that this DNA is of good enough quality to sequence it and then I need to get that specific sequencing method running - it's a bit more developement and validation than people usually think. If all that works (lets say 6 weeks from now -IF it works) then we can talk.What's the damage?