Great question. Cats are considered domestic animals. Whether they actually are or not, that is how they are often categorized. In many states, critters like Ts are categorized as wild animals so owners are strictly liable for any harm, and the school by knowing you have a T and not having the critter removed, may have some liabiity also.It's hard to understand their POV. If they're held liable should something happen, why do they allow Area Coordinators to keep cats as they live in the dorms with students?
Here is an explanation. And again, I'm a T owner and sad for you, but the explanation is to show their POV. I know others can and will jump in to defend Ts and distinguish them from other wild critters and that is fine, I didn't write the following description of strict liability, but this is the way the school is probably looking at the whole issue:
Strict Liability Lawsuits Can Arise from Keeping Wild Animals as Pets
Keeping a wild animal may lead to a strict liability lawsuit. Wild animals are animals that are not recognized as capable of being domesticated, such as tigers, snakes and primates. Their behavior is unpredictable; they tend to be dangerous; and when they injure someone, the injuries can be devastating.
Therefore, having a wild animal as a pet may lead to strict liability if the animal injures someone. The test is not whether the particular animal has been tamed, but whether the animal belongs to a class of animals recognized as incapable of being tamed. Additionally, it is irrelevant how careful the owner was in trying to prevent the animal from injuring others. If the wild animal causes personal injury, the owner may be strictly liable.
Read more: http://law.suite101.com/article.cfm/strict_liability_law#ixzz0U2IOT3OK