Me describing my leirus quinquestriatus sting after being stung

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
Follow up question. Do you feel it is justified to 1. Intentionally get stung. 2. Handle such venomous species at all?

Is there any particular reason you want to be stung?

Is there any particular reason you feel handling these animals is respectful husbandry?

If not for the likes (narcissism), is it for a rush? Are you conducting actual research or something?

Again, it just doesn't add up. Seems like horrendous husbandry practices that are unfair to the animal. They are not domesticated dogs. Stinging you = they are stressed out. Is this somehow fair or ethical towards the animal you are doing this to?
Well, you do bring up a valid point about it being stressful to the animal. But when I do it, I do it very quickly. I don't sit there and torment them. And why do I get stung? Mostly curiosity and for my own satisfaction. It is quite interesting. But I wouldn't describe it as a rush. More just an interesting experience.
 

CRX

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
1,085
This thread is crazy
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kada

Arachnobaron
Arachnosupporter
Joined
May 17, 2023
Messages
533
Well, you do bring up a valid point about it being stressful to the animal. But when I do it, I do it very quickly. I don't sit there and torment them. And why do I get stung? Mostly curiosity and for my own satisfaction. It is quite interesting. But I wouldn't describe it as a rush. More just an interesting experience.
OK. I understand your point. Thank you for explaining.

Following question:

Do you think publicly advertising/posting getting stung by deadly species of animals is responsible? Like that youtibe video I poster earlier. But add in the fact they are pets that can be bought easily, not just wild wild animals as in that guys videos.

Nevermind the animals stress for now. But just being aware of the world, people, psychology and how the internet works. By posting this, in this way, some child will inevitably want to try it too. I won't lie, I was a naive teenager at one time as well and wanted to test boundaries. Thankfully it was with things that couldn't kill me. But it was massively selfish, disrespectful and counter productive.

Do you feel it is actually responsible to post: "I intentionally get stung by deadly scorpions because it is interesting" ?

I am not judging you, per se. But one MUST realize that this isn't an option, a voice inside your head or a note in your notebook. It is public. This forum has loads of people with mental instability, young persons etc. Reading this type of attitude, and even having caring members post actual scientific evidence, might confuse a person. Nevermind maybe the officials in any given country skimming through boards like this to get insight on how responsible the industry may be.

I can understand "buyer beware" type justifications. Or, in this case, reader beware. But at the same time your interests don't really seem to have any merit, utility or purpose other than "it's fun" for you. That's where I originally questioned if this is intentional, and, or attention. Narcissim/likes/banter/whatever the thing may be. Is it really beneficial doing such things? If it is interesting to you, why post it publicly when there seems to be a 0:100 ratio of benefit:repercussion. Again, genuinely asking, maybe I am not seeing the benefit you see to this type of advertising.

I feel this is kind of like the jackass movies. They have the right to do it. And some people may chuckle. But what purpose does it serve? What benefit does it achieve, especially paired against the detriment?

Unlike jackass, this has VERY real implications towards the critters we are supposed to be responsible for. I view this as perhaps similar to staging cats killing native species and posting on say Facebook or YouTube... interesting to some, perhaps. But overall all negative. The knee jerk reactions are only going to harm your cats. Cats are just being cats. Scorpions are just being scorpions. But if we put them into the scenario of HAVING to defend, or eat something cute, the knee jerk reaction by society is ban them. This is less an opinion and more just an observable reality that can easily be searched. Anywhere, not just the usual USA/Euro centric circles. It's not just counter productive to the hobby, which is already insanely controversial on its best day, but also seems unethical to both the animals and toward society. Especially if one lives with other peoople/pets or has neighbors, or lives in a climate such animals can survive in (conservation).

Sometimes I wish the exotics trade would follow a more dart frog industry styled approach of maturity and compassion/conservation towards the animals they are caring for/enslaving. But still be better than them.

This thread is crazy
Yes, it is. The good thing is that it is allowed to continue to hash out people opinions. If it was deleted in the beginning, there would be so much less expression of opinions, education, ideas etc that nothing would change. Allowing such craziness to unfold and converse is paramount. I strongly disagree with the person's style, but at least can respect him/her for not just flying off the handle and not getting emotional. It enables a dialog, which is needed. So, at least this thread has that. And that should be praised as is.
 

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
OK. I understand your point. Thank you for explaining.

Following question:

Do you think publicly advertising/posting getting stung by deadly species of animals is responsible? Like that youtibe video I poster earlier. But add in the fact they are pets that can be bought easily, not just wild wild animals as in that guys videos.

Nevermind the animals stress for now. But just being aware of the world, people, psychology and how the internet works. By posting this, in this way, some child will inevitably want to try it too. I won't lie, I was a naive teenager at one time as well and wanted to test boundaries. Thankfully it was with things that couldn't kill me. But it was massively selfish, disrespectful and counter productive.

Do you feel it is actually responsible to post: "I intentionally get stung by deadly scorpions because it is interesting" ?

I am not judging you, per se. But one MUST realize that this isn't an option, a voice inside your head or a note in your notebook. It is public. This forum has loads of people with mental instability, young persons etc. Reading this type of attitude, and even having caring members post actual scientific evidence, might confuse a person. Nevermind maybe the officials in any given country skimming through boards like this to get insight on how responsible the industry may be.

I can understand "buyer beware" type justifications. Or, in this case, reader beware. But at the same time your interests don't really seem to have any merit, utility or purpose other than "it's fun" for you. That's where I originally questioned if this is intentional, and, or attention. Narcissim/likes/banter/whatever the thing may be. Is it really beneficial doing such things? If it is interesting to you, why post it publicly when there seems to be a 0:100 ratio of benefit:repercussion. Again, genuinely asking, maybe I am not seeing the benefit you see to this type of advertising.

I feel this is kind of like the jackass movies. They have the right to do it. And some people may chuckle. But what purpose does it serve? What benefit does it achieve, especially paired against the detriment?

Unlike jackass, this has VERY real implications towards the critters we are supposed to be responsible for. I view this as perhaps similar to staging cats killing native species and posting on say Facebook or YouTube... interesting to some, perhaps. But overall all negative. The knee jerk reactions are only going to harm your cats. Cats are just being cats. Scorpions are just being scorpions. But if we put them into the scenario of HAVING to defend, or eat something cute, the knee jerk reaction by society is ban them. This is less an opinion and more just an observable reality that can easily be searched. Anywhere, not just the usual USA/Euro centric circles. It's not just counter productive to the hobby, which is already insanely controversial on its best day, but also seems unethical to both the animals and toward society. Especially if one lives with other peoople/pets or has neighbors, or lives in a climate such animals can survive in (conservation).

Sometimes I wish the exotics trade would follow a more dart frog industry styled approach of maturity and compassion/conservation towards the animals they are caring for/enslaving. But still be better than them.



Yes, it is. The good thing is that it is allowed to continue to hash out people opinions. If it was deleted in the beginning, there would be so much less expression of opinions, education, ideas etc that nothing would change. Allowing such craziness to unfold and converse is paramount. I strongly disagree with the person's style, but at least can respect him/her for not just flying off the handle and not getting emotional. It enables a dialog, which is needed. So, at least this thread has that. And that should be praised as is.
Ughh! I just had a super long and good response to this question written out but my phone died and it all got deleted. But to make it brief, I don't think it's totally responsible to post such things being that, yes it could be copied but I consider it a calculated risk that I deem to be quite low... Just like being stung in the first place. Androctonus Australis has a very low mortality rate of about .5 to 2 percent if left untreated. Now granted, my hottentotta tamulus are significantly more dangerous. But let's say it's a maximum 5 percent chance of death for a adult. The weaker 5 percent will be the ones to die, immunocompromised individuals or ppl with underlying health conditions or ppl who are repeatedly stung. Now I don't think too many ppl will copy me. But if they do, I don't think too much bad will happen. But even if someone ends up in the ER over a sting, I doubt it'll make the news. Not saying it can't. We all read the Androctonus amoreuxi story from outpostsurvivor31 but statistically they won't end up in the er im the first place but even if they do... It's not like the news station will likely be called. And I don't think too many kids have access to venom level 4 or 5 scorpions. And even if worst case scenario, somebody copied me and dies (EXTREMELY unlikely), I don't necessarily think they'd ban because of one single incident... Unless it became a trend. But in the scenario of a death, I'll admit that there could be a ban, even if not on a federal level, then maybe on a statewide level or as a city ordinance. But, honestly, I doubt it. Now that being said, there is still some risk... Not only to myself but to others should somebody decide to copy me. And to the hobby should it go wrong when and if someone does copy me. So, yes I probably shouldn't do it. But I simply don't think that it's at all likely that my actions will be mimicked and even if they are, I just don't see it LIKELY going wrong. And if it does go wrong, I don't see it LIKELY ending in death or whatnot. And even if it does God forbid end in something like that, I'm not sure whether it's cause a ban or not. But I don't think so. At least not nationwide. So it's a calculated risk that I consider to be too low to take into account. But then again, that's just my opinion. And everyone's entitled to their own. I view it like speeding. Yeah, it's an unnecessary risk but it's just so much fun and statistically, it can be done with minimal risk to self or others. All I can really do is say, "Don't try this at home" and hopefully no one goes against it. Now, that being said, I do NOT plan on being stung by any of my 5 new hemiscorpius lepturus as that would likely pose a significant risk of maiming me even if I did survive, which I probably would.
 
Last edited:

Outpost31Survivor

Arachnoprince
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
1,633
Ughh! I just had a super long and good response to this question written out but my phone died and it all got deleted. But to make it brief, I don't think it's totally responsible to post such things being that, yes it could be copied but I consider it a calculated risk that I deem to be quite low... Just like being stung in the first place. Androctonus Australis has a very low mortality rate of about .5 to 2 percent if left untreated. Now granted, my hottentotta tamulus are significantly more dangerous. But let's say it's a maximum 5 percent chance of death for a adult. The weaker 5 percent will be the ones to die, immunocompromised individuals or ppl with underlying health conditions or ppl who are repeatedly stung. Now I don't think too many ppl will copy me. But if they do, I don't think too much bad will happen. But even if someone ends up in the ER over a sting, I doubt it'll make the news. Not saying it can't. We all read the Androctonus amoreuxi story from outpostsurvivor31 but statistically they won't end up in the er im the first place but even if they do... It's not like the news station will likely be called. And I don't think too many kids have access to venom level 4 or 5 scorpions. And even if worst case scenario, somebody copied me and dies (EXTREMELY unlikely), I don't necessarily think they'd ban because of one single incident... Unless it became a trend. But in the scenario of a death, I'll admit that there could be a ban, even if not on a federal level, then maybe on a statewide level or as a city ordinance. But, honestly, I doubt it. Now that being said, there is still some risk... Not only to myself but to others should somebody decide to copy me. And to the hobby should it go wrong when and if someone does copy me. So, yes I probably shouldn't do it. But I simply don't think that it's at all likely that my actions will be mimicked and even if they are, I just don't see it LIKELY going wrong. And if it does go wrong, I don't see it LIKELY ending in death or whatnot. And even if it does God forbid end in something like that, I'm not sure whether it's cause a ban or not. But I don't think so. At least not nationwide. So it's a calculated risk that I consider to be too low to take into account. But then again, that's just my opinion. And everyone's entitled to their own. I view it like speeding. Yeah, it's an unnecessary risk but it's just so much fun and statistically, it can be done with minimal risk to self or others. All I can really do is say, "Don't try this at home" and hopefully no one goes against it. Now, that being said, I do NOT plan on being stung by any of my 5 new hemiscorpius lepturus as that would likely pose a significant risk of maiming me even if I did survive, which I probably would.
Severe scorpion envenomations are always potential risk when dealing with highly venomous scorpions. But yes, envenomations of healthy adults are usually not life-threatening due to their higher corporeal surface, weight, and lower blood plasma concentration of venom. Plus, we can not overlook the fact, early hospital presentation has saved a huge percentage of lives too. Late hospital admission limits the usefulness of the antivenom action to prevent mediator release during an autonomic storm and reduce lethality. Although supportive treatments alone can efficiently improve cardiac functions. A few years ago, in Algeria, a 38 year female teacher died of heart failure from an Androctonus australis sting but not before she suffered a ten day coma because she didn't receive proper symptomatic supportive care nor was there antivenom available to treat her. You may suffer much more serious consequences with a sting from an A. australis from a Tunisian locale or H. tamulus than you have had with a couple of A. australis from an Egyptian locale.
 

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
Severe scorpion envenomations are always potential risk when dealing with highly venomous scorpions. But yes, envenomations of healthy adults are usually not life-threatening due to their higher corporeal surface, weight, and lower blood plasma concentration of venom. Plus, we can not overlook the fact, early hospital presentation has saved a huge percentage of lives too. Late hospital admission limits the usefulness of the antivenom action to prevent mediator release during an autonomic storm and reduce lethality. Although supportive treatments alone can efficiently improve cardiac functions. A few years ago, in Algeria, a 38 year female teacher died of heart failure from an Androctonus australis sting but not before she suffered a ten day coma because she didn't receive proper symptomatic supportive care nor was there antivenom available to treat her. You may suffer much more serious consequences with a sting from an A. australis from a Tunisian locale or H. tamulus than you have had with a couple of A. australis from an Egyptian locale.
I was wondering... You said that a sting of A. Australis from a Tunisian locale may be worse than a sting from an Egyptian locale? But wasn't the mortality rate .5 percent in Tunisia according to the stats you sent? And do you know which ones are worse? The ones to the north or South of the chott El jarid
 

Outpost31Survivor

Arachnoprince
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
1,633
I was wondering... You said that a sting of A. Australis from a Tunisian locale may be worse than a sting from an Egyptian locale? But wasn't the mortality rate .5 percent in Tunisia according to the stats you sent? And do you know which ones are worse? The ones to the north or South of the chott El jarid
What does it matter? Androctonus australis is responsible for most severe scorpion envenomations and fatalities in Tunisia. Plus, these mortality rates are determined by hospital records. What about unreported and unconfirmed cases that have no hospital record? Furthermore, early medical consultation and standardized management of patients is one of largest factors in determining a good prognosis in both moderate and severe envenomations. Bottom line, every time you are stung by one of your pets there is risk of a severe scorpion envenomation which are medical emergencies that can turn deadly without immediate hospital admission.

In one Tunisian study, there were 769 severe scorpion envenomations of which 72 died (mortality rate 9.4%).

Unless, if possible you have built up an immunity or even higher tolerance for Androctonus venom (whether that is possible or not I am not entirely sure). One last determining factor, did these australis give you a quick tap or did any of them ever grind their stingers into you and give you an extra spicy dose?
 

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
What does it matter? Androctonus australis is responsible for most severe scorpion envenomations and fatalities in Tunisia. Plus, these mortality rates are determined by hospital records. What about unreported and unconfirmed cases that have no hospital record? Furthermore, early medical consultation and standardized management of patients is one of largest factors in determining a good prognosis in both moderate and severe envenomations. Bottom line, every time you are stung by one of your pets there is risk of a severe scorpion envenomation which are medical emergencies that can turn deadly without immediate hospital admission.

In one Tunisian study, there were 769 severe scorpion envenomations of which 72 died (mortality rate 9.4%).

Unless, if possible you have built up an immunity or even higher tolerance for Androctonus venom (whether that is possible or not I am not entirely sure). One last determining factor, did these australis give you a quick tap or did any of them ever grind their stingers into you and give you an extra spicy dose?
Once it ground its stinger into my arm. That was the time I got chest pains that I told you about. As for the tolerance aspect of things, tolerance to at least Androctonus venom is real and seems to last at least several months. To date, my first (and accidental if I may add) sting has been the most severe. The tolerance is similar to the tolerance one gets to lsd, not alcohol. It's not gradual and slow over time. It's quick and very strong. One sting and you're virtually immunized for at least a few months. Its not that the venom has no effect but the effect is quite minimal and even more localized than it is normally. However, the sting site will still be cold to the touch. But it has honestly been over a year since we I've taken a sting.
And secondly, I looked up the study you mentioned and it was actually a study of 951 severe stings and 80 point whatever percent were grade 3, and 72 died, resulting in a 7.5 percent mortality rate... Which is still quite high. But then again, these were severe stings. Not to undermine the danger they pose. I'm just saying it's not as high as it sounds.
 
Last edited:

Joey Spijkers

Arachnoprince
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,138
I don't think too many kids have access to venom level 4 or 5 scorpions.
In most areas, there are absolutely no laws, rules or regulations preventing anyone from buying any scorpion. So why wouldn't a minor go out, buy a medically significant scorpion and freehandle it? Especially when an adult told them they could and they'll be fine? Remember even a 15 year old is far more likely to have severe symptoms than an 18 year old.
Now I don't think too many ppl will copy me.
Just a guess there. Does the benefit of posting it outway the potential risk? I personally don't see any benefit, just potential risks.
I don't necessarily think they'd ban because of one single incident.
I'm not sure whether it's cause a ban or not. But I don't think so. At least not nationwide.
Spain is trying to ban almost all non-native reptiles and arthropods, Italy is not too far behind, in Norway and Iceland no reptiles can be legally kept whatsoever, Florida is starting to ban more and more species, the Netherlands and Belgium are planning to create positive species lists.
'Exotic pets' of any kind, whether it be reptiles, amphibians or arthropods are being banned in multiple different places in the world. Restrictions are spreading, and the more countries do it, the easier it is for others to follow suit. Most of these are places where there is little threat for species becoming invasive due to the climate and it's not just the dangerous species being banned. It is not an environmental or human health/safety reason (even if that's what it's played off as), it's simply because to a lot of people, there is a negative stigma attached to our hobby. Why would we want to reinforce that belief?
 

Kada

Arachnobaron
Arachnosupporter
Joined
May 17, 2023
Messages
533
Ughh! I just had a super long and good response to this question written out but my phone died and it all got deleted. But to make it brief, I don't think it's totally responsible to post such things being that, yes it could be copied but I consider it a calculated risk that I deem to be quite low... Just like being stung in the first place. Androctonus Australis has a very low mortality rate of about .5 to 2 percent if left untreated. Now granted, my hottentotta tamulus are significantly more dangerous. But let's say it's a maximum 5 percent chance of death for a adult. The weaker 5 percent will be the ones to die, immunocompromised individuals or ppl with underlying health conditions or ppl who are repeatedly stung. Now I don't think too many ppl will copy me. But if they do, I don't think too much bad will happen. But even if someone ends up in the ER over a sting, I doubt it'll make the news. Not saying it can't. We all read the Androctonus amoreuxi story from outpostsurvivor31 but statistically they won't end up in the er im the first place but even if they do... It's not like the news station will likely be called. And I don't think too many kids have access to venom level 4 or 5 scorpions. And even if worst case scenario, somebody copied me and dies (EXTREMELY unlikely), I don't necessarily think they'd ban because of one single incident... Unless it became a trend. But in the scenario of a death, I'll admit that there could be a ban, even if not on a federal level, then maybe on a statewide level or as a city ordinance. But, honestly, I doubt it. Now that being said, there is still some risk... Not only to myself but to others should somebody decide to copy me. And to the hobby should it go wrong when and if someone does copy me. So, yes I probably shouldn't do it. But I simply don't think that it's at all likely that my actions will be mimicked and even if they are, I just don't see it LIKELY going wrong. And if it does go wrong, I don't see it LIKELY ending in death or whatnot. And even if it does God forbid end in something like that, I'm not sure whether it's cause a ban or not. But I don't think so. At least not nationwide. So it's a calculated risk that I consider to be too low to take into account. But then again, that's just my opinion. And everyone's entitled to their own. I view it like speeding. Yeah, it's an unnecessary risk but it's just so much fun and statistically, it can be done with minimal risk to self or others. All I can really do is say, "Don't try this at home" and hopefully no one goes against it. Now, that being said, I do NOT plan on being stung by any of my 5 new hemiscorpius lepturus as that would likely pose a significant risk of maiming me even if I did survive, which I probably would.
I must still insist, I strongly disagree with your attitude that intentionally being stung and posting online is OK. There is literally zero benefit to anyone, and loads of risk for literally everyone. Be it government control, peoples safety etc. It's just a waste of public resources (health care) getting stung intentionally. Again, only actual research I could see being possibly justified.

I do like your attitude willing to calmly discuss this. But I also worry about your seemingly clear lack of foresight if potential issues based off of advertising such irresponsible behavior. It seems autistic, if i am being honest. Not a judgement or anything, but it sure ckmes across as such as a casual reader of this thread. For me, at least, this is why I have such strong feelings about you doing this being wrong. Ethically. If you did it silently, that would be one thing. Still a risk for your housemates, neighbour's in my opinion. But everyone should have the right to die in ways they choose if they don't affect others. I feel this does affect others though. That's an issue for everyone.

Your opinions are noted in that you feel your government won't react to such behavior. This seems rather selfish and USA centric in my opinion as many keepers/readers are not in your town, state or country. Many different members from many different countries read this. Even non members. From everywhere. What happens if someone from Africa or Asia reads this or that species is not so dangerous based on your posts, wants to mess around and get stung for fun. That place may not have proper medical care. Dead children can ensue. As other posters have thoroughly posted about variations in envenomations.

What happens when people from very advanced countries with great health care systems want to play these kinds of games? Like Taiwan for example. They are not native, but can naturalize easily. The hospital will not know what was the source and care would be basically winging it as we have no meaningful active scorpions. No antivenom/procedures in place. Yet thousands of keepers of say fat tails.
Even if the hospitals are very well equipped. Is this fair to tax the system off moronic games?

Like above post mentioned, many countries and provinces/states/cities/municipalities are banning more and more. Frankly, I don't think us keeps have any right to whine about them banning our passion. Because we are literally and overtly telling them we are not nearly responsible enough to care for such animals. Threads like this literally justify a government ban without any question. All we can do is watch and submit, because there are so many irresponsible people. Frankly, over the past decades I have only seen the tik tok style attention evolution grow exponentially. I kind of even hope we have more bans now, because people aren't showing much maturity these days. Even for fish, nevermind deadly scorpions. These animals are a responsibility, not a right. Best we f*cking get that into our heads right quick. These animals also deserve better [care].

My country has recently banned 8000 plus species from import now. Precisely because people are too stupid to keep them. Granted, Taiwans bans are more like a hawaii/Florida concern of naturalization. Less so envenomations...which will change as we have a couple naturalized foreign scorpion species now thanks to morons. But we can buy fat tail scorpions for just a couple bucks (usd). Kids. Online, mail order. I do have problems with this. Because generally speaking people are not that intelligent. And encouraging dangerous acts, especially with other sentient organisms, is beyond irresponsible and selfish.

I truly am still at a loss as per your intentions. It screams narcissism and ego. If not, what is it? It's terrible husbandry practices at best. It's craving attention almost certainly. In terms of the animals well being, not good. It's dangerous to yourself, which doesn't matter because you are willing to die to do it. But it's even more wreckless because it it advertised to the globe. 6 year olds to 80 year Olds read this site. People in the dessert without much education that might find it fun, to researchers scratching their heads. People without good health care to rich folks that live beside a hospital. You don't know who all reads this.

The question remains: Why advertise doing such potentially dangerous things that for sure are stressful to the animals and have zero benefit to the animal/society, yet have extreme risks to both?
 
Last edited:

Outpost31Survivor

Arachnoprince
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
1,633
Once it ground its stinger into my arm. That was the time I got chest pains that I told you about. As for the tolerance aspect of things, tolerance to at least Androctonus venom is real and seems to last at least several months. To date, my first (and accidental if I may add) sting has been the most severe. The tolerance is similar to the tolerance one gets to lsd, not alcohol. It's not gradual and slow over time. It's quick and very strong. One sting and you're virtually immunized for at least a few months. Its not that the venom has no effect but the effect is quite minimal and even more localized than it is normally. However, the sting site will still be cold to the touch. But it has honestly been over a year since we I've taken a sting.
And secondly, I looked up the study you mentioned and it was actually a study of 951 severe stings and 80 point whatever percent were grade 3, and 72 died, resulting in a 7.5 percent mortality rate... Which is still quite high. But then again, these were severe stings. Not to undermine the danger they pose. I'm just saying it's not as high as it sounds.
Well the lower rate of severe scorpion envenomations should be a positive re-enforcement to genuine responsible and mature scorpion hobbyist that there is a high probability that their exotic pet can not kill them. But that they should give it all proper due respect that severe envenomations and deaths due occur to adults just at a much smaller rate. And that unlike children, the elderly, and individuals with impaired immunity, the symptons are more gradual and progressive first its the local symptons then mild to moderate non-life threatening systemic symptons may or may not manifest but the first few hours are crucial if those moderate neuroexcitation symptons intensify into an autonomic storm that can potentially evolve into a severe and deadly sequlae featuring the manifestation of one or more life threatening signs and symptons representing respiratory, cardiac, and central nervous system failure:

respiratory failure/cyanosis/pulmonary edema

cardiogenic shock/hypotension/ventricular arrhythmia

deep unresponsive coma/brain edema/acute paralysis

Screenshot_20240313-041457_Samsung Internet.jpg


Disclaimer: I am no doctor nor medically trained. I explained the best I could in my layman's terms.

We all do not possess the same amount of tolerance individually and individual scorpions may not be armed with the same amount and quantity of toxins in their venom e.g. Dave's Tunisian Androctonus australis may be deadlier than any of John's Egyptian Androctonus australis capable of producing a much worse envenomation. And again, John's Egyptian Androctonus australis may put Joe into the ICU.

But I re-iterate, statistically speaking according to hospital records, healthy adults usually do not suffer life threatening envenomations.
 
Last edited:

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
I must still insist, I strongly disagree with your attitude that intentionally being stung and posting online is OK. There is literally zero benefit to anyone, and loads of risk for literally everyone. Be it government control, peoples safety etc. It's just a waste of public resources (health care) getting stung intentionally. Again, only actual research I could see being possibly justified.

I do like your attitude willing to calmly discuss this. But I also worry about your seemingly clear lack of foresight if potential issues based off of advertising such irresponsible behavior. It seems autistic, if i am being honest. Not a judgement or anything, but it sure ckmes across as such as a casual reader of this thread. For me, at least, this is why I have such strong feelings about you doing this being wrong. Ethically. If you did it silently, that would be one thing. Still a risk for your housemates, neighbour's in my opinion. But everyone should have the right to die in ways they choose if they don't affect others. I feel this does affect others though. That's an issue for everyone.

Your opinions are noted in that you feel your government won't react to such behavior. This seems rather selfish and USA centric in my opinion as many keepers/readers are not in your town, state or country. Many different members from many different countries read this. Even non members. From everywhere. What happens if someone from Africa or Asia reads this or that species is not so dangerous based on your posts, wants to mess around and get stung for fun. That place may not have proper medical care. Dead children can ensue. As other posters have thoroughly posted about variations in envenomations.

What happens when people from very advanced countries with great health care systems want to play these kinds of games? Like Taiwan for example. They are not native, but can naturalize easily. The hospital will not know what was the source and care would be basically winging it as we have no meaningful active scorpions. No antivenom/procedures in place. Yet thousands of keepers of say fat tails.
Even if the hospitals are very well equipped. Is this fair to tax the system off moronic games?

Like above post mentioned, many countries and provinces/states/cities/municipalities are banning more and more. Frankly, I don't think us keeps have any right to whine about them banning our passion. Because we are literally and overtly telling them we are not nearly responsible enough to care for such animals. Threads like this literally justify a government ban without any question. All we can do is watch and submit, because there are so many irresponsible people. Frankly, over the past decades I have only seen the tik tok style attention evolution grow exponentially. I kind of even hope we have more bans now, because people aren't showing much maturity these days. Even for fish, nevermind deadly scorpions. These animals are a responsibility, not a right. Best we f*cking get that into our heads right quick. These animals also deserve better [care].

My country has recently banned 8000 plus species from import now. Precisely because people are too stupid to keep them. Granted, Taiwans bans are more like a hawaii/Florida concern of naturalization. Less so envenomations...which will change as we have a couple naturalized foreign scorpion species now thanks to morons. But we can buy fat tail scorpions for just a couple bucks (usd). Kids. Online, mail order. I do have problems with this. Because generally speaking people are not that intelligent. And encouraging dangerous acts, especially with other sentient organisms, is beyond irresponsible and selfish.

I truly am still at a loss as per your intentions. It screams narcissism and ego. If not, what is it? It's terrible husbandry practices at best. It's craving attention almost certainly. In terms of the animals well being, not good. It's dangerous to yourself, which doesn't matter because you are willing to die to do it. But it's even more wreckless because it it advertised to the globe. 6 year olds to 80 year Olds read this site. People in the dessert without much education that might find it fun, to researchers scratching their heads. People without good health care to rich folks that live beside a hospital. You don't know who all reads this.

The question remains: Why advertise doing such potentially dangerous things that for sure are stressful to the animals and have zero benefit to the animal/society, yet have extreme risks to both?
Well, while I disagree on the level of irresponsibility of what I'm posting, I can at least respect your concern and the way you've all come to me requesting me not to publicly post such things. Still, although it isn't for attention per se, I still do have the desire to discuss such envenomations with others who at least understand such things. So how about we reach a middle ground? How about if I make one final post where I can get people who are interested to PM me? And then we can carry out any further discussions in personal messages rather than openly on these forums? That way, I'm not going to anger others such as yourself or others who may feel the same way.

Hello everyone. This will be my last post on such subjects due to some other users (understandably) becoming irritated with me posting such things publicly. However as I discussed, I am willing to not post such things anymore in exchange for this being my final post on such a subject and anyone else who would like to have such discussions about me being intentionally stung by hot scorpions, please simply PM me so that when I am stung, I at least have someone to discuss it with. By the way, although this will be my last post on such a subject, I in no way condone anybody copying me. It is not a safe practice that I do and you should not try it at home. Here's the conversation that led to this final thread being posted.
 

Outpost31Survivor

Arachnoprince
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
1,633
Well, while I disagree on the level of irresponsibility of what I'm posting, I can at least respect your concern and the way you've all come to me requesting me not to publicly post such things. Still, although it isn't for attention per se, I still do have the desire to discuss such envenomations with others who at least understand such things. So how about we reach a middle ground? How about if I make one final post where I can get people who are interested to PM me? And then we can carry out any further discussions in personal messages rather than openly on these forums? That way, I'm not going to anger others such as yourself or others who may feel the same way.
Intentionally being envenomated by medically significant scorpions is not being responsible and setting a good example you are participating in risk taking and attention seeking behavior right now whether for a dopamine reward, personal gratification, or simply validation. But quite possibly one of these times one of your pets is going to have your name written on it whether due greater toxicity, dosage of venom, number of stings, or any or all of the above and it is going to absolutely wreck your week or put you in ICU fighting for your life. And the symptons will be so unpleasant (or dangerous) you may swear off keeping medically significant scorpions ever again for the rest of your life. But yes, you have become a common statistic, now get over it. Let's not check mark all the empty boxes.

Hello everyone. This will be my last post on such subjects due to some other users (understandably) becoming irritated with me posting such things publicly. However as I discussed, I am willing to not post such things anymore in exchange for this being my final post on such a subject and anyone else who would like to have such discussions about me being intentionally stung by hot scorpions, please simply PM me so that when I am stung, I at least have someone to discuss it with. By the way, although this will be my last post on such a subject, I in no way condone anybody copying me. It is not a safe practice that I do and you should not try it at home. Here's the conversation that led to this final thread being posted.
Handling medically significant scorpions is great way to provoke a sting and risks multiple stings. Actually, the hobby needs to strongly discourage handling dangerous scorpions. There is only risk and zero reward for both pet and keeper.
 

The Snark

Dumpster Fire of the Gods
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
11,422
The last time I handled a hot - over 40 years ago. Brought a group of about 20 riders into the camp in the high Sierra's. People and horses milling about and a rattler hesitantly trying to get out of the crowd. Ideal opportunity so I got a good grab behind it's head. Then a revelation, this is as dumb as it gets. It's a three footer and seriously pissed off so both hands to hold it and now what? The more it struggled the tighter I gripped it which made it struggle more. Now instead of doing my job corralling the horses, graining them, working the tack and taking control of the chaos setting up camp I had to walk a half mile away from the camp to throw it into the brush where it wasn't likely to come back.
After that super stupid people would wonder or razz me in that every time I saw a rattler anywhere near the camp or on the trail I'd immediately shoot it. No. I hate killing them. But the possible consequences of not killing them is worse, and catch and relocate much worse yet.
Leave handling hots to trained experts that have taken all eventualities into account before hand.
 
Last edited:

Dry Desert

Arachnoprince
Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
1,598
Hello everyone. This will be my last post on such subjects due to some other users (understandably) becoming irritated with me posting such things publicly. However as I discussed, I am willing to not post such things anymore in exchange for this being my final post on such a subject and anyone else who would like to have such discussions about me being intentionally stung by hot scorpions, please simply PM me so that when I am stung, I at least have someone to discuss it with. By the way, although this will be my last post on such a subject, I in no way condone anybody copying me. It is not a safe practice that I do and you should not try it at home. Here's the conversation that led to this final thread being posted.
Unless you are " milking " anything venomous for medical or scientific research I personally don't see the point.
 

The Snark

Dumpster Fire of the Gods
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
11,422
Unless you are " milking " anything venomous for medical or scientific research I personally don't see the point....
... but you'll sure as heck feel it after a lightning speed tag.
 

darkness975

Latrodectus
Arachnosupporter +
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
6,017
It is a terrible idea any way you look at it. It is the kind of irresponsibility that invokes ban happy legislators. It is doing a 100% disservice to the entire hobby.

How about if I make one final post where I can get people who are interested to PM me? And then we can carry out any further discussions in personal messages rather than openly on these forums? That way, I'm not going to anger others such as yourself or others who may feel the same way.
I think that would be for the best. We don't need to give them reasons to stack against us.

Please just remember one final thought. If you end up in the hospital the story will very likely get out and it will look bad for all of us.
 

Johnn

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Messages
229
It is a terrible idea any way you look at it. It is the kind of irresponsibility that invokes ban happy legislators. It is doing a 100% disservice to the entire hobby.
Which is why this is my final post on such subjects
 

Craig

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Oct 12, 2002
Messages
246
I think that would be for the best. We don't need to give them reasons to stack against us.

Please just remember one final thought. If you end up in the hospital the story will very likely get out and it will look bad for all of us.
I said this a while ago when this person first started posting this nonsense. A mod needs to delete these posts. They do not do anything for the hobby. This person also needs to be black listed fron buying scorpions. Something and is going to happen.
 
Top