It's still a little cool for my standards...I grew up in Hawaii.That was impressive. :clap:
Nice weather you got there btw -.-
It's somewhere in the sixties right now I think.-11F here -.-
*envy*It's somewhere in the sixties right now I think.
LOL! I hope so... Here it's very cold so you can bet that all my doors work very well.It's still a little cool for my standards...I grew up in Hawaii.
Jojos, yeah, when I get a testin', I'll post results. Gotta focus on replacing the front door to the house first.
--Joe
Stan and Marguerite, please. No need to get so stuffy.... An honor to have you post on my thread, Mr. and Mrs. Schultz....
It has something to do with the strong alcohol tanning the exoskeleton and preventing further water exchange, I think. Thus, you start out with relatively mild alcohol, changing it daily, and gradually work your way to the 100% stuff to extract every last bit of water. It's a long, arduous process. I'd have a lot of trouble completing the job. I'm too impatient!... I wonder why they wouldn't just use 100% alcohol right away? I'm sure there is some reason....
Most biological pigments are sensitive to light. They degrade with time as they're exposed to light. They also oxidize or otherwise degrade with time because they're slightly unstable and sensitive to just about any reactive compounds. Degrading biological tissues as well as most preservatives are loaded with reactive compounds. That's why almost all biological specimens in museums are all but worthless for DNA analysis. Though not a pigment, DNA is just as sensitive, maybe more so. It's the same principle.... It's been my experience with perserving animals in alcohol (I have a bat, a mole, a slipper lobster, a squid, among other things), that they too alter their coloration after time...
Soaking a live tarantula in alcohol ruins it, but you already knew that. I'm just being a $m@rt***. Sorry.well i have heard soaking a T in alcohol ruins it...
Or merely set the dish carefully on the hood of a running car. There's almost surely a wide spectrum of vibrations that would work, and the gentle thrumming of an idling engine would probably work just fine.... I would use a hand held vibrating sander next to the mold if I didn't have a vacuum chamber. But I would only use to shake loose the trapped air and then turn it off and let it set to cure.
Guiding the bigger bubbles out to the surface with a chopstick works very well also.Or merely set the dish carefully on the hood of a running car. There's almost surely a wide spectrum of vibrations that would work, and the gentle thrumming of an idling engine would probably work just fine.
Joe and All -
Stan and Marguerite, please. No need to get so stuffy.
It has something to do with the strong alcohol tanning the exoskeleton and preventing further water exchange, I think. Thus, you start out with relatively mild alcohol, changing it daily, and gradually work your way to the 100% stuff to extract every last bit of water. It's a long, arduous process. I'd have a lot of trouble completing the job. I'm too impatient!
Most biological pigments are sensitive to light. They degrade with time as they're exposed to light. They also oxidize or otherwise degrade with time because they're slightly unstable and sensitive to just about any reactive compounds. Degrading biological tissues as well as most preservatives are loaded with reactive compounds. That's why almost all biological specimens in museums are all but worthless for DNA analysis. Though not a pigment, DNA is just as sensitive, maybe more so. It's the same principle.
In living organisms the degraded pigments are constantly replaced with freshly manufactured stuff. Not so in a pickled specimen. Virtually every museum specimen on the planet is a melange of different shades of tan through brown to black because melanin is one of the few biological pigments that doesn't degrade readily. That's also why coloring is rarely used in identifying biological specimens by the professionals. (Patterns, on the other hand, are sometimes used.)
BTW, I found the reference for that booklet:
Hardin, Cleo E. 1963. How to Preserve Animal and Other Specimens in Clear Plastic. Naturegraph Publishers. Happy Camp, Calif.
You can get copies through amazon.com at http://www.amazon.com/Preserve-Anim...=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1233537852&sr=1-5 and they're fairly inexpensive.
Keep up the good work and keep us informed. (Hint: Append your further comments to this thread - even months down the road - so we can keep track of the history.)
I don't mean to knock that booklet, but it was published in 1963? I wonder if there are any more recent publications with updated methods.BTW, I found the reference for that booklet:
Hardin, Cleo E. 1963. How to Preserve Animal and Other Specimens in Clear Plastic. Naturegraph Publishers. Happy Camp, Calif.
You got kinda the answer which I'll re-state here:...
No, I did not do anything to remove the water from the carcass first. I was not sure how to preserve the carcass long enough post-mortem without freezing, so I bought what I needed and just went for it. I wonder why they wouldn't just use 100% alcohol right away? I'm sure there is some reason.
It's been my experience with perserving animals in alcohol (I have a bat, a mole, a slipper lobster, a squid, among other things), that they too alter their coloration after time. Whether it was hours or weeks or months, I couldn't tell you, but I have seen the color change. It may be worth a small experiment though with some more common animals (we have tons of anoles around here.
With regards to the water rotting inside the carcass and seeping through the resin, I suppose that's a possibility (similar to osmosis?), and I have no choice now but to wait and see what happens.
...
And that's basically the story. Ethyl alcohol (particularly 100% - which is practically impossible to get) is a very potent absorber of water (hygroscopic is the magic term). If you add it to larger objects, you run the risk of just sucking all the water out of them as you would if you stuck them in a heat-dessicator....
It has something to do with the strong alcohol tanning the exoskeleton and preventing further water exchange, I think. Thus, you start out with relatively mild alcohol, changing it daily, and gradually work your way to the 100% stuff to extract every last bit of water. It's a long, arduous process. I'd have a lot of trouble completing the job. I'm too impatient!
By definition, all pigments are interacting with light. Each time this happens, you get a slightly increased chance that you'll break the molecules (technically, this often occurs from transfer of electrons out of pi-orbitals, where they then have the chance to jump onto something like water nearby)....
Most biological pigments are sensitive to light. They degrade with time as they're exposed to light. They also oxidize or otherwise degrade with time because they're slightly unstable and sensitive to just about any reactive compounds. Degrading biological tissues as well as most preservatives are loaded with reactive compounds. That's why almost all biological specimens in museums are all but worthless for DNA analysis. Though not a pigment, DNA is just as sensitive, maybe more so. It's the same principle.
In living organisms the degraded pigments are constantly replaced with freshly manufactured stuff. Not so in a pickled specimen. Virtually every museum specimen on the planet is a melange of different shades of tan through brown to black because melanin is one of the few biological pigments that doesn't degrade readily. That's also why coloring is rarely used in identifying biological specimens by the professionals. (Patterns, on the other hand, are sometimes used.)
...
That, and they're mostly stored in formalin... which binds up DNA and proteins and all sorts and makes it practically useless.... That's why almost all biological specimens in museums are all but worthless for DNA analysis. Though not a pigment, DNA is just as sensitive, maybe more so. It's the same principle.
...
You are, as always, most welcome.I was hoping you would post here, DrAce. Thanks.
Great info, too. Gotta love the technical stuff.
Is it possible the heat from the engine would hinder or assist in the resin setting?Or merely set the dish carefully on the hood of a running car. There's almost surely a wide spectrum of vibrations that would work, and the gentle thrumming of an idling engine would probably work just fine.