- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,199
That's one line of thinking, which doesn't necessarily match keepers' experiences. Restricting space could, for example be working with their basic biology by prolonging the tolerance young spiderlings can have for each other while sharing the confined space of a burrow with restricted space. I think it is widely believed that sacmates kept in close proximity from hatching have a better chance of communal survival, than do strangers that have lived far apart being forced together. I'm not arguing in favor of keeping them communally, but one motivation to do so is to see behaviors unobservable unless they are living close together, such as communal feeding (sharing prey). Of course, behavior in captivity is not necessarily going to match how they may behave in the wild either. Another widely held belief, which is probably correct, is that it's best to keep communals well-fed, which could alleviate the conflict over resources you imagine (i.e. if resources are abundant, there need not be any conflict).restricting space means territorial conflict over resources which typically results in cannibalism.
keeping them in close proximity I am guessing is in denial of their basic biology, which is why the close quarters experiments fail. I've yet to see one work long term with adults with results. That's why someone needs to do an experiment with a large enclosure.
If someone wants to send me to Socotra Island I will go do the research and find an average spacing for in the wild species