NecroNeko
Arachnopeon
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 38
seems female to me...but i want to listen from u guys, thx!

100% female guaranteed.whoever said you cant ever be accurate with a pic, never saw this one
100% female guaranteed.whoever said you cant ever be accurate with a pic, never saw this one
Exactly. Guarantee a sex via ventral and by a picture, is as accurate as a gum made ruler.100% Guaranteed, huh? So you'll be buying the spider back from him if you're wrong, even though you didn't sell it?
I think it looks female as well but i'm not issuing any "guarantees". ;P
if its male ill send him a p metalica. guaranteed.100% Guaranteed, huh? So you'll be buying the spider back from him if you're wrong, even though you didn't sell it?
I think it looks female as well but i'm not issuing any "guarantees". ;P
there is photos that cant be guaranteed and then theres photos like above that can be confidently guaranteed. and yes i will buy it back even though i didnt sell it to him if it is male which it is not, clearly. i mean just look at that gash! it screams femaleExactly. Guarantee a sex via ventral and by a picture, is as accurate as a gum made ruler.
Sorry but this one is very obvious. I also would send over a P. metallica if I was wrong here. It's 100% guaranteed female. Not even a remote chance of it being male.I have to agree that you can't ventrally sex 100% accurately. I posted a ventral pic a while back of my B. albopilosum and everyone, including myself, thought it was male. Well, SHE just molted.....and she's definietly 100% a she now!!![]()
Not to start one of our famous argumentsSorry but this one is very obvious. I also would send over a P. metallica if I was wrong here. It's 100% guaranteed female. Not even a remote chance of it being male.
And the people that told you male on your albo were tired or smoking something or guessing because that looks 100% female to me too, as well as your smithi.
+1. Definitely femme.Sorry but this one is very obvious. I also would send over a P. metallica if I was wrong here. It's 100% guaranteed female. Not even a remote chance of it being male.
Scientific? I can do that.Not to start one of our famous arguments
But thats not very scientific point of view, Ryan![]()
![]()
Come on Ryan, dont bore me hereScientific? I can do that.
There is no patch of hairs above the furrow that a male would have and would easily seen.
In the photos I linked you can see that patch of hairs I am talking about. They are most typically circle shaped to a degree and parked right between the upper pair of book lungs and above the epigastric furrow.
Additionally you can see how the epigastric furrow of the female in this picture is wide and straight across between the book lungs.
The male has a closed off furrow that is limited to just the center area in addition to the hairs present above the furrow.
Here are a few examples of a male.
http://www.arachnoboards.com/ab/gallery/showimage.php?i=12516&catid=searchresults&searchid=92201
http://www.atshq.org/forum/showthread.php?p=41214
Actually I think your humor (if that is what you were going for) missed by a mile.Come on Ryan, dont bore me here...You know what I meant.