I give up. It is what it is.It's not your responsibility to decide which posts are appropriate and which are not and yet it is your responsibility to call people jerks for just answering a question it seems.![]()
I can't think of a good reply to that one so il paraphrase Bob.yes that being an answer to a question. nothing more.![]()
maybe extreme knowledge in our hobby can come across a bad attitude. ........look up some of his posts...............I'm just wondering why he needs to be so obviously surly. It's not my responsibility to decide which posts are appropriate and which are not, and last time I checked, having a bad attitude wasn't against forum rules, so what am I supposed to report anyway? I just want to know why the anonymity of the internet turns people into jerks.
Awesome, thanks dude.The Lampropelma violaceopes that Abraham described in 1924 is this species:
http://asianarboreals.googlepages.com/lampropelmaviolaceopes
Confusingly it is sold as Cyriopagopus sp. Blue, Malaysian variety (#1) and a Singapore variety (#2). The differences assumed to be subtle colour differences and in particular that the malaysian variety should have a olive/tan carapace, whereas in the Singapore variety it is dark bluish. Fact is that these differences are related to size and age. Thus old specimens has the dark carapace and a darker violet hue than younger specimens that will sport a paler carapace and a lighter violet hue. The same darkening with age is seen in C. schioedtei and P. everetti as well.
The "Lampropelma violaceopes" that Botar and Swift has for sale is this species:
http://asianarboreals.googlepages.com/ornithoctoninaeg.sp."haplopelmarobustum"
This species is as of yet unidentified, but has been attempted sold under a herd of names; Cyriopagopus sp. "Blue-femur", Lampropelma violaceopes and Haplopelma robustum. It has nothing to do with Singapore, but come from high altitudes in the central malaysian highland. As with every other species this also has it's own subtle variations depending on age and locality.
Regards
Søren
Hi Soren
Has any decision been reached as to what the correct name is now?
Cheers ~ :?
Guys, Guys. I really could`nt care less who put what name to what, I would just like "your" expert advice on the care of this type of T![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Guess that's a no...??See my previous reply:
http://www.arachnoboards.com/ab/showpost.php?p=1137592&postcount=52
Regards
Søren
Sorry man ~ we did kinda hijack the thread...!Guys, Guys. I really could`nt care less who put what name to what, I would just like "your" expert advice on the care of this type of T![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()