- Joined
- Dec 13, 2005
- Messages
- 1,322
I agree, but we should see pictures of other species confirmed as Lampropelma as well as other Cyriopagopuses and compare real time. No other Lampropelma realy seems to be one!
Keep out a watchful eye because I do believe L. v. will be moved into the genus Cyriopagopus sometime in the futureIMO "singapore blue" should be cyriopagopus sp. singapore blue. It looks very similar (from the same family) as c. schroderi(sp?) where as the other species that is seen labled as L. violaceps looks a little less "related". I realize this is a very unscientific analysis but if you look closely at pics the shoe seems to fit. and I love it when you can send one species to a different family to fill that gap and then another species drops into it's place so the name isn't going obsolete, We were just talking about the wrong spider for a bit there. There's my layman's two cents. Wish I would have paid more attention to classification and nomenclature(again sp?) when I was in school.
That is why I posted what I didIn my opinion, Singablue looks more Cyriopagopus to me.