- Joined
- Oct 21, 2007
- Messages
- 1,387
Ridiculous................ Vets cant perform emergency surgury for certain animals until consent is given?? Read the article..
Wow. . . .. iam at loss for words. .. all i can say is thats just pure ignorance, . .. . . what a pure ignorant news report on our hobby.http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/news_wtnh_count_on_8_investigation_exotic_pets_200903232247_rev1
recent news story on this.
"Everything from Emperor Scorpions to a King Baboon Taranchula"http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/news_wtnh_count_on_8_investigation_exotic_pets_200903232247_rev1
recent news story on this.
ridiculous! i thought that was funny... ;PNow I do agree owning a alligator as a pet is a bit rediculas!
Seriously how can anyone take what these people say if they can't even spell things right.
This is my letter. Anything I should change before I hit send?My name is Jessica Azzinnari. I am not a CT resident but I have read your piece of legislation and many of the animals that have been suggested to be banned are in no way dangerous.
1. Suidae. 16 species are recognized and two are domestic pigs. They in fact make wonderful pets, can very well be domesticated, and are smart like a dog. There is really no need to ban the domestic species as there have been no deaths attributed to them in many many years.
2.Any venomous snake and large snake families. Responsible owners should be able to keep these animals. It seems that since you find a few nutty, irresponsible ones, you felt the need to put a ban on these snakes. Please punish the irresponsible owners instead of the rest of us who keep our snakes in very secure enclosures as well as take safety precautions in order to care for them. Deaths by any of these animals especially the larger constrictors are very rare. Honestly, how many deaths can you attribute to these snakes? It is because owners of these snakes know what their doing and never ever handle a large specimen alone. As far as venomous snakes, a responsible owner orders their own antivenin in the case of a rare bite if it even happens at all. The fact that rear-fanged snakes are banned is odd. The envenomation process for these snakes is very difficult because they have to chew and most have very mild venom to begin with.
3.Monitors. These are not dangerous lizards. Large? Yes. Dangerous? No. At least with the exception of the Komodo which has already been banned and is protected through CITES.
4.Arachnids. There has never ever been a recorded death directly related to a tarantula bite. I personally own them. I have never been bitten because I respect my animals. Some species can cause a lot of pain but death is highly unlikely. They will also not be an invasive species because there would be no other tarantula even in the same genus to be able to breed with. There are some species of medically significant scorpions but responsible owners would never handle them and always keep them in secure enclosures. The same goes for medically significant true spiders such as Phoneutria ssp. from Central and South America and even the native spiders.
5.Genet. There is also no need to ban this animal. They are a little skittish but otherwise can be tamed down to a reasonable level. I've been in a lot of contact with these and the worst they can do is give a bite like a cat.
6.Dendrobatidae, These are in no way dangerous when kept in captivity. They cannot synthesize their own venom and get it from the prey eaten in the wild. Without eating the specific prey, no venom will be produced.
I can understand the concern with keeping exotics especially with the recent python and chimp incidents. However, this reaction is extreme. This is a punishment to those who have been responsible all along and have had necessary permits required to keep some of these. Instead of punishing them, why can't you crack down on those keeping permit-required animals without the permit? The lady with the chimp did not have a safe facility to keep it, nor did she keep a tranq gun or even a gun in general if the animal did decide to attack. She is the reason a woman was severely injured. The animals I mentioned are kept because they are beautiful and fascinating specimens, NOT because we think they are cool and we want to see them get big. I respect all my animals as do many of the people in your state. Please rethink this considering you are planning to ban harmless animals with this bill.
Lol I didn't even catch that one ;Pridiculous! i thought that was funny... ;P
This is my letter. Anything I should change before I hit send?
...which is why I'm writing the letter. I addressed animals that he is trying to make illegal and that includes venomous arachnids.its good except for one point that no one seems to be realizing, even the people who reported on this and should have done their homework before going on TV about it- IT IS NOT (yet) ILLEGAL to keep tarantulas or scorpions in connecticut. you do not need a permit or any permission. it is only illegal to sell them, which is why you dont see T's in any pet stores here. It is currently legal to have them in your home as pets- until they pass this new bill.