When a known, respected breeder or collector steps forward with real information about this animal, then I'll be less skeptical. In the meantime I'll enjoy the entertainment but doubt the existence. I've known too many people in the past who have enjoyed "creating" non-existent animals as a joke on others to be completely gullible at this stage of my life. But who knows - maybe it's real and someone on this board will win one in a Nigerian lottery.A dyed tarantula? Is it too hard to believe there can be a blue Lasiodora? Many different genera all over the world have species that are solid blue why is it so hard to believe?
I'll have to take your word on that. I don't know him or know anything about him. Still - information on how many of these are in captivity, where they came from, why nobody heard of them before, etc., would add credibility to the story.I think I can trust Galhardo.
OK. More witnesses is a good thing. And the information you added is helpful. I'm not saying that it's impossible that such an animal exists, but when something seems too good to be true - it often is. There really could be some terminally ill person in Nigeria who needs to transfer $10 million to my account - but credibility needs to be established.Hi all, I´m Galhardo´s friend and also the hand in the video is our firend´s hand. Yep, i´m from Brazil too.
Videos can be faked in much the same way that PhotoShop can alter photos. Anyone with a reasonably good video-editing program can do it.It´s funny to see that even with the video people still don´t believe it.
But people DO waste time PhotoShopping pictures. They do it for many reasons, including pulling practical jokes on other people. Back in the days before PhotoShop or digital images I was involved in "creating" a fake mountain king snake. It was part of a spoof lecture that was presented at a herpetological society meeting. We used infrared film, gelatin filters and some other technologies to produce high quality 35mm slides of a mountain kingsnake that was green, black and white. (Bright grass green) Three people claimed to have seen the species photographed, and we had good photos of several different specimens. People in the audience gasped and drooled over the "new species", and swallowed the story eagerly. But by the end of the lecture the presenters were laughing so hard that the audience finally figured out they were being put on.Here are some other pics from another friend. I know, the internet is full of photoshoped pics, but, hey, why would I lose my time creating a blue spider since I´m no seller, I don´t make money with it and I´m not interested in any kind of deal? If I didn´t have one individual myself I wouldn´t be wasting my time posting in this thread.
True. I myself work with motion graphics and video editing. And by working with it everyday I know that the only reason a person would get to the point of faking a video like this, having to track colors with the original footage, masking every movement of the spider, etc.. would be to earn some money, or maybe to get some status, which means nothing. I know people do that, but, honestly, do that in a tarantula forum with so many well informed people is just stupid.Videos can be faked in much the same way that PhotoShop can alter photos. Anyone with a reasonably good video-editing program can do it.
The reason for little or no supporting data is that there isn´t enough studies or projects going on with tarantulas as subjects in the world, as we all seem to agree. Imagine it now in Brazil, where we have laws that complicate things even to the one or two professional brazilian arachnologists. Brazil has serious problens with the HUGE burocracy we have here. For a professional arachnologist to collect species for resourches purposes, one need a series of permits that take 6 months to be validated. It´s so much work that serious people give up and go back to their labs. And I don´t see any of this changing in the near future. Unfortunatly you will have to believe in our brazilian word for a long time, or maybe not. Or maybe wait till someone here decides to go against the law and ship this species to other countries, one thing me or any other friend of mine is not willing to do. Unfortunately there are laws against it and nobody wants to go to jail.So... in this age of Nigerian scams and internet hoaxes, when I see pictures being shown on an internet forum of a too-good-to-be-true new species with little or no supporting data to give it credibility - I smile and wait. Maybe it will turn out to be true.
After you get your hands on one of these, wich probably won´t take long, I bet you will.Or maybe we'll all have a good laugh afterwards.
I suppose that means Cenobiopelma is going to be revalidated, right? Do you have any more information about the article such as:i´m also from Brazil, but i´m not here to be one more witness, i just need to say that this species isn´t a Lasiodora or Acanthoscurria, neither a Vitallius this beaultifull jewel belongs to the ancient genus: Cenobiopelma (Mello-Letão & Arlé,1934), and was discoverd recently here in Brazil inthe states of Minas Gerais and Goiás!
i didnt doubt that this sp existed. someone posted pics of this sp like 2 years ago and no one really replied to the thread thinking it was fake. well since then about 3 more threads have come up with pics. i knew it! and now thiers finally proof!I dont have any article because its a new specie!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj6bdhHvV-M
guys... please dont PM me asking about selling anything, I dont sell spiders, I dont have any spider.