- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 17,968
Where have you been, send me a PM when clean you out your inbox. Good to see are around and kicking.Back by popular demand.
Where have you been, send me a PM when clean you out your inbox. Good to see are around and kicking.Back by popular demand.
YOU'RE ALIVE!!!!! Yay!Chalcodes!
Euhm, no. G.rosea isn't recommended for beginning T keepers because of them being common.Personally, I think people here are just mostly against the Grammostola Rosea because it's so common in the hobby, and always recommended for beginners.I.. That said, any species can have individuals with wildly varying personalities, so there's that. I try not to handle my Ts (anymore, yes I did handle them before I realized how bad that was for them) but my Grammostola sp "North" is very docile if somewhat shy.
He/she just molted and looks beautiful, but hey, I'm biased and I don't own a chalcodes (yet!)
You misunderstand me. They aren't recommended here, and I agree with it, but in the internet in general? They're pretty much your 'first tarantula' almost in every other website -- not that these websites are any good, obviously.Euhm, no. G.rosea isn't recommended for beginning T keepers because of them being common.
They're not recommended for
beginners because they are notorious for moodswings and extended fasting. Throw in the fact that they grow slow, that makes it not the best first species.
You should note that these guys are slow growers so if you get them at this size they will be tiny for a long time.
Grammostola porteri/rosea are an excellent choice for beginners - beginners who have done their homework and are aware that they can fast for many months and could have mood swings ranging from angel to demon.You misunderstand me. They aren't recommended here, and I agree with it, but in the internet in general? They're pretty much your 'first tarantula' almost in every other website -- not that these websites are any good, obviously.
Only reason why I wouldn't recommend it to someone who just joins the hobby is because they can be pet rocks. They fast for months and even years, and with their slow growth rate and slow attitude, I personally am not a fan. Individuals vary, but that is what I have heard. IMO, I like to own T's that are always doing something. T's that love to eat, always webbing, changing their burrows, etc. That is just me thoughGrammostola porteri/rosea are an excellent choice for beginners - beginners who have done their homework and are aware that they can fast for many months and could have mood swings ranging from angel to demon.
When it comes to dead easy husbandry, they are an excellent choice. When it comes to getting a species that will not cost you a fortune - even as an adult female, they are an excellent choice. When it comes to a very low maintenance, low venom toxicity, low defensiveness, they are a perfect choice for a first tarantula. When it comes to forgiving new keepers mistakes that would easily kill lots of other species, they are the perfect choice.
As long as you are prepared for the very small list of cons, as opposed to the very long list of pros, then this is an excellent choice for a very first tarantula.
I might argue that G. pulchripes is better overall as a first spider, although I agree that there are way worse choices than the G. Rosea. As with anything, you just have to research and know what you're getting into.Grammostola porteri/rosea are an excellent choice for beginners - beginners who have done their homework and are aware that they can fast for many months and could have mood swings ranging from angel to demon.
When it comes to dead easy husbandry, they are an excellent choice. When it comes to getting a species that will not cost you a fortune - even as an adult female, they are an excellent choice. When it comes to a very low maintenance, low venom toxicity, low defensiveness, they are a perfect choice for a first tarantula. When it comes to forgiving new keeper's mistakes that would easily kill lots of other species, they are the perfect choice.
As long as you are prepared for the very small list of cons, as opposed to the very long list of pros, then they are an excellent choice for a very first tarantula.
While I like a lot of things about the G.pulchripes (I have 4 of them myself) they just recently started catching on as the new liked flavor of the month. We tend to bunch the same responses as a group when we recommend Ts just like when we recommend care. There are a lot of good start out Ts in the hobby and it really just depends on what the hobbyist is expecting or looking for.I might argue that G. pulchripes is better overall as a first spider, although I agree that there are way worse choices than the G. Rosea. As with anything, you just have to research and know what you're getting into.
Ah, it seemed like you dismissed the G.rosea because of how common they are.You misunderstand me. They aren't recommended here, and I agree with it, but in the internet in general? They're pretty much your 'first tarantula' almost in every other website -- not that these websites are any good, obviously.
I agree with you. I still don't have a G. rosea. Every time I see a female for sale, I pause and then think there is something else I would rather have instead. I love Aphonopelma, but do wish there was more LB females instead of so many WC specimens. It is also too bad that Eupalastrus campestratus are just as rare and expensive as E. Sp. Red for adult specimens.Ah, it seemed like you dismissed the G.rosea because of how common they are.
Getting a G.rosea that actually is a G.rosea instead of a porteri/sp.North/Cafe/Maule is another daunting task, since those species are mixed up nine out of ten times, like Brachypelma/Avicularia is.
But that aside, i think there are pretty G.rosea/porteri and so on, out there. I've been thinking about getting one for the heck of it but i'll definitely get a juvi/adult instead of a sling. Two slow growing slings are enough for me
My reason is that they do everything so slowly that it makes learning anything from them darn near impossible. Its hard to learn from something that hardly even moves for long stretches at a time and has incredible low food requirements (we all like to watch them feed, but its extra exciting for a new keeper).Only reason why I wouldn't recommend it to someone who just joins the hobby is because they can be pet rocks. They fast for months and even years, and with their slow growth rate and slow attitude, I personally am not a fan. Individuals vary, but that is what I have heard. IMO, I like to own T's that are always doing something. T's that love to eat, always webbing, changing their burrows, etc. That is just me though
I think your experiences differ from most. Definitely different than mine as my Brachys are all much much more active from my porteri. i now see where you are coming from.My Evelyn was always very active her whole life and was a very sweet and tolerant girl. My Ophelia is also very active and spends a lot of time webbing up her fake plants. She is far more active than both my male B.smithi combined. She seems to be less tolerant than my Evelyn was, though.
And I think that they are gorgeous too...
View attachment 230130
Honestly, I'd say that they're not great to handle either. Hamsters are nocturnal, so often when you're taking them out, you're pulling them out of bed, and they REALLY don't like it, so biting is a common response. I worked at Petsmart for a couple of years, and by far, we got the most bites from hamsters...easily more than every other animal combined. They are painful because they are small but deep puncture wounds and take a while to heal. We didn't harass the hamsters any more than we had to, but all cages are completely cleaned out once a week, and customers do want to see the animal they're about to buy.I hear hamsters are good for handling (i wouldn't know) Tarantulas really aren't though
I appreciate that a lot, thank you.Pretty t...you take such nice pics all the time
TRUE STORYHonestly, I'd say that they're not great to handle either. Hamsters are nocturnal, so often when you're taking them out, you're pulling them out of bed, and they REALLY don't like it, so biting is a common response. I worked at Petsmart for a couple of years, and by far, we got the most bites from hamsters...easily more than every other animal combined. They are painful because they are small but deep puncture wounds and take a while to heal. We didn't harass the hamsters any more than we had to, but all cages are completely cleaned out once a week, and customers do want to see the animal they're about to buy.
Would I rather handle a hamster or a tarantula? Hamster, because it's less likely to die from handling, and there's no venom, but I can tell you from many hamster bites that they're no fun.