Of course I am open to the DNA evidence. Perhaps this is what will be unveiled in this much anticipated paper, but to be honest, I am doubtful of this. If it is there, and documented, then I will have no problem at all accepting that these are separate species.so post 181 means nothing then well thats fine because I gave you some limited evidence showing how there has been no captive breeding success between blondi x burgendy yet there has been breeding success between burgendy x burgendy and blondi x blondi. Ok I know full to well that this is not be all and end all but it is a dam sight more evidence to show they are different to what you have given to show they are the same. Oh but don't have to give any evidence to this as I forgot you don't have to give any evidence to say that something is the same.
did you see post 191? that is an interesting DNA look at things but will off course not be able to be taken into account for the simple reason you do not want to take it into account.
You only have one way of looking at this and do not even consider a different view from your own so it is dead end descussion. There really is no point to continue. Even if the DNA evidence was there you would not beleive them to be different because it is fix set in youir head and you are not even open to the idea that they even might be.
This is fine by me as long as it is fine with you that I will be treating them as if different species.
The reason why you are wrong about me having to provide evidence that they are the same is because it is just natural to assume so. Just as it is natural to assume that the spaghetti monster doesn't exist. There has been NO EVIDENCE to suggest otherwise, so why would I believe in it?
Although I can't PROVE that the spaghetti monster doesn't exist, I can give you PLENTY of sound logical reasons why I don't accept that he exists. In the same way that I have already given you countless reasons (The entire species concepts, DNA/Genetic and evolutionary relationships, etc) for why I don't accept that they are different species.
All of my reasoning for not accepting that they are separate species (and not accepting that a spaghetti monster exists) is well established, readily available and reliable information that you are free to research yourself. In contrast, your evidence is limited to your personal experiences, online stories, and other unreliable word of mouth. You even said it yourself, that you provided "limited evidence," there really is no such thing. You either prove something or you don't. Until it is proven, you can't make the claims. .
I encourage you to explore the foundations of taxonomy and when you do you will realize that is never safe to make such stubborn assumptions are you and many others are doing here.