- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 845
1. appearance (color/morphology/size)
2. urticating hairs
3. cost
4. diffculty of care (some species have stricter temprequirements, like P. subfusca)
I started out selecting the T's I did more for color and pattern than anything else, while sticking to the more docile sp. I then moved my collection more into arboreals and got into OW's.
Morphology wise, I love the Ceratogyrus, and like how the Ephebopus sp. have urticating hairs on the pedipalps.
There are T's out there that I would love to have but I'm willing to wait for the price to drop.
I'm much more interested in keeping OW species, arboreals, and dwarf sp these days. Why I choose to keep brachy's and pamphos while wanting to stay away from almost all other NW terristrals, based on the urticating hair factor, I have no idea.
I think nerri has the right idea of making the categories a 1 to 10 scale factor.
2. urticating hairs
3. cost
4. diffculty of care (some species have stricter temprequirements, like P. subfusca)
I started out selecting the T's I did more for color and pattern than anything else, while sticking to the more docile sp. I then moved my collection more into arboreals and got into OW's.
Morphology wise, I love the Ceratogyrus, and like how the Ephebopus sp. have urticating hairs on the pedipalps.
There are T's out there that I would love to have but I'm willing to wait for the price to drop.
I'm much more interested in keeping OW species, arboreals, and dwarf sp these days. Why I choose to keep brachy's and pamphos while wanting to stay away from almost all other NW terristrals, based on the urticating hair factor, I have no idea.
I think nerri has the right idea of making the categories a 1 to 10 scale factor.