- Joined
- Dec 23, 2002
- Messages
- 859
For the record, I wanted to say 1 unsure, 2 definitely female. But that was not an option so I had to pick one
Don't worry about that. As long as you provide the proper explanations I hope you will go on correcting meI hope you don't think I'm picking on you by correcting some of the terminology in your posts.
You're going to have to send me Brianna Hildebrand and a large tub of caramel if you want me to forget this betrayalCookie as peace offering...
I could do the caramelYou're going to have to send me Brianna Hildebrand and a large tub of caramel if you want me to forget this betrayal![]()
See, I wouldn't even try to sex from that first photo. I'd just reply "too blurry" or shrug my shoulders and let someone else try.These two pics are actually of the same spider and she's female. Yes, the top pic is from a female. I played with lighting a bit and realized I could make her look male if I shone the flashlight at just the right angle and took the pic just a little out of focus. And that's what I wanted to demonstrate: Even experienced people get it wrong if the only have a bad pic to work with. So, think again before you commit to identifying a specific sex from a bad pic. - I know this was just a guessing game and the experienced people would probably not have claimed male if a pic like that would show up in the sexing gallery.
I agree entirely i think also so would many more membersvent sexing is definitely accurate. but it totally depends on the person vent sexing. many groups on facebook dont allow vet sexing photos as morons tend to argue in large numbers over them. everyones an expert vent sexer.Its much much easier in person. When you are able to look from any angle you want with a flashlight.