humidity has been stable mid 60s to low 70s %. Temps fairly stable, Temps 70-78F 21-25C.What's the humidity like right now, especially in comparison to the rest of the year?
IMO, it's likely that temperature, pressure, humidity, and even nutrition all might have some influence in triggering a molt, or more precisely, in determining a molting schedule as a tarantula matures.
@AphonopelmaTX , If I remember correctly, you're a bit of a data nerd like me. I'll let you know if I get the system up and running before the end of the year or not.
No, not a theory killer. The data point is just an outlier that needs to be accounted for. Very little is actually known and set in stone in regards to this topic, so there are quite a few theories that could potentially be valid.humidity has been stable mid 60s to low 70s %. Temps fairly stable, Temps 70-78F 21-25C.
my A. bicoloratum molted this weekend. I personally think Ts release a pheromonal trigger, so you can get cascading molts that IMO are more influenced by the pheromonal trigger than by climatic conditions.
people can say my experience doesn't disprove anything, but claiming dropping pressure causes molting and then being presented with data showing the opposite, is typically a theory killer.
It is a hormone, not a pheromone, called ecdysone that triggers the process of regeneration leading up to ecdysis (or molting). Backing up a bit, molting is just the point in growth where an arthropod removes its old skin. There are many more processes that occur before and after that event. The hormone ecdysone is present in all invertebrates that molt (crustaceans, insects, arachnids, etc.) and experiments have shown that it is transferable between different types of arthropods. For example, isolating ecdysone from a crab and injecting it into an arachnid will cause the arachnid to undergo ecdysis and vice versa. I can't recall the paper that detailed the experiment proving this, but it can be easily found online.No, not a theory killer. The data point is just an outlier that needs to be accounted for. Very little is actually known and set in stone in regards to this topic, so there are quite a few theories that could potentially be valid.
Personally though, I think that with what we know about reproduction in the wild, the timing of male maturity in line with certain seasons, and the timing of eggsacks that have been found in situ that weather patterns are the trigger for more mature specimens. It's possible that with species like A. hentzi, where you have mass male maturity and 'migrations', you might also have pheromonal triggers for timing purposes. I think it's quite a stretch though for the answer to be that there is a pheromonal trigger which all species, regardless of the genus/subfamily, will respond to by molting. Just my opinion.
yes, and breeding cycles for certain species come after rainy periods. But male maturity is all over the place in many cases. In So Cal our 2 main specimens A. eutylenum and A. steindachneri have different breeding periods (summer for steindachneri and fall for eutylenum) even though they can both be found in close proximity. So why the different seasons? Probably evolutionary, so they don't conflict. Both seasons also tend to be high pressure, warm, and dry. A hentzi is a fall mate as well, so is A. jonnycashi. This conflicts with say C. cyaneopubescens which mates after monsoon season. So there is no standard across a single genus let alone and entire Phyla.No, not a theory killer. The data point is just an outlier that needs to be accounted for. Very little is actually known and set in stone in regards to this topic, so there are quite a few theories that could potentially be valid.
Personally though, I think that with what we know about reproduction in the wild, the timing of male maturity in line with certain seasons, and the timing of eggsacks that have been found in situ that weather patterns are the trigger for more mature specimens. It's possible that with species like A. hentzi, where you have mass male maturity and 'migrations', you might also have pheromonal triggers for timing purposes. I think it's quite a stretch though for the answer to be that there is a pheromonal trigger which all species, regardless of the genus/subfamily, will respond to by molting. Just my opinion.
Here I'd take into the account the time they take to lay the eggsac after mating and the hatching time. It could be interesting to see if it matches any specific seasonal conditionsSo why the different seasons? Probably evolutionary, so they don't conflict. Both seasons also tend to be high pressure, warm, and dry. A hentzi is a fall mate as well, so is A. jonnycashi. This conflicts with say C. cyaneopubescens which mates after monsoon season. So there is no standard across a single genus let alone and entire Phyla
We are talking about a drop in pressure, not specifically low pressure conditions. You can have drops in pressure even in high pressure climatic conditions.I shouldn't be seeing this number of molts under steady / high pressure
Correct as usual. The entire molting process, like most biological processes, is hormone controlled. Hormones are internal chemical triggers that effect the organism that produced them. Pheromones are externally secreted chemical triggers that effect other specimens, usually of the same species, and can be used to communicate. The question in this case is what triggers the trigger, so to say. The idea of a mass, interspecies pheromonal trigger is what I'm questioning. I can see how multiple species/genus from a common descendent could all retain and use a single hormone for an internal biological process like molting (the "if-it's-broke-don't-fix-it theory"). I can't see how multiple species/genus from all around the world with a common descendent would all retain and use a single pheromone for communication. To me, that's akin to myself and a person only fluent in Mandarin having a complete and productive discussion because we're both descended from the same ancestor, even though I don't speak Mandarin. It's possible, but IMO highly unlikely. Atleast one of us is just going to be confused.It is a hormone, not a pheromone, called ecdysone that triggers the process of regeneration leading up to ecdysis (or molting). Backing up a bit, molting is just the point in growth where an arthropod removes its old skin. There are many more processes that occur before and after that event. The hormone ecdysone is present in all invertebrates that molt (crustaceans, insects, arachnids, etc.) and experiments have shown that it is transferable between different types of arthropods. For example, isolating ecdysone from a crab and injecting it into an arachnid will cause the arachnid to undergo ecdysis and vice versa. I can't recall the paper that detailed the experiment proving this, but it can be easily found online.
To be more specific about what this thread is about, we are examining possible environmental triggers for the production of ecdysone, and not ecdysis specifically. As mentioned, it is well known that tarantulas in temperate climates have distinct mating periods that correspond to the seasons. In order for that to be possible, the ultimate molt has to occur prior to the mating season therefore ecdysis corresponds to the seasons as well. What we don't know is if there are environmental triggers that kick off the production of ecdysone, and if so, what they are.
I think we're both in agreement that barometric pressure isn't the "key ingredient" in triggering a moltyes, and breeding cycles for certain species come after rainy periods. But male maturity is all over the place in many cases. In So Cal our 2 main specimens A. eutylenum and A. steindachneri have different breeding periods (summer for steindachneri and fall for eutylenum) even though they can both be found in close proximity. So why the different seasons? Probably evolutionary, so they don't conflict. Both seasons also tend to be high pressure, warm, and dry. A hentzi is a fall mate as well, so is A. jonnycashi. This conflicts with say C. cyaneopubescens which mates after monsoon season. So there is no standard across a single genus let alone and entire Phyla.
It isn't a single data point, at this point, it is now half a dozen and counting. So agreed, nothing is in stone, but if dropping pressure was a key trigger, I shouldn't be seeing this number of molts under steady / high pressure. It could be a factor, but these data points indicate there must be something stronger, because you wouldn't have so many outliers if it were the key ingredient. Perhaps you are having similar molt cascades with the first just falling during that period, or are they spread out over multiples?
but the pressure here has been steady within a single mB the entire time so 29 and change to 30 and change subtly moving about over the last few weeks. No notable drops in pressure. We've had a couple weeks of what most folks would call 'ideal condistions'We are talking about a drop in pressure, not specifically low pressure conditions. You can have drops in pressure even in high pressure climatic conditions.
No, I am talking about a pheromonal release, something on the breeze. Yes, induced by hormones, but an actual pheromone other Ts pick up on. T's can't really pick up on either Ts hormones, all the more so through glass. I am thinking they are picking up something being released, similar to scents being used during matingIt is a hormone, not a pheromone, called ecdysone that triggers the process of regeneration leading up to ecdysis (or molting). Backing up a bit, molting is just the point in growth where an arthropod removes its old skin. There are many more processes that occur before and after that event. The hormone ecdysone is present in all invertebrates that molt (crustaceans, insects, arachnids, etc.) and experiments have shown that it is transferable between different types of arthropods. For example, isolating ecdysone from a crab and injecting it into an arachnid will cause the arachnid to undergo ecdysis and vice versa. I can't recall the paper that detailed the experiment proving this, but it can be easily found online.
To be more specific about what this thread is about, we are examining possible environmental triggers for the production of ecdysone, and not ecdysis specifically. As mentioned, it is well known that tarantulas in temperate climates have distinct mating periods that correspond to the seasons. In order for that to be possible, the ultimate molt has to occur prior to the mating season therefore ecdysis corresponds to the seasons as well. What we don't know is if there are environmental triggers that kick off the production of ecdysone, and if so, what they are.
A single digit in hg it's a huge drop in mbar. 29hg=982'05 mbar and 30 Hg=1015'92 mBar, so a 33'87 mbar difference.but the pressure here has been steady within a single mB the entire time so 29 and change to 30
but we're talking less than a single digit, we're talking fractions tons of a digit. Perhaps I didn't word it correct. High 29s to low 30s meaning 29.88 to 30.02A single digit in hg it's a huge drop in mbar. 29hg=982'05 mbar and 30 Hg=1015'92 mBar, so a 33'87 mbar difference.
Usually a good day stays around 1013-1020 mbar.
That's another thing, now makes more sense.but we're talking less than a single digit, we're talking fractions tons of a digit. Perhaps I didn't word it correct. High 29s to low 30s meaning 29.88 to 30.02
this will show you how stable we are this week and this is how it has been for the last 3 weeks. Most shifts are less than .06
![]()
Atmospheric pressure in San Diego with trend indicator
Know the current atmospheric pressure in San Diego and the pressure variations for the next few daystides4fishing.com
Sorry I was so vagueThat's another thing, now makes more sense.
Change in humidity? Not only atmospheric but enclosures too (added moisture)2 more molts (Adult A. geniculata and Juvenile B. hamorri ). At the show in Anaheim, same Barometric Pressure we had a ton of molts in both Tarantulas and Scorpions. Steady 29.98 +/-
not to my knowledge. Humidity has been pretty consistent. A tad more @ my house than @ Anaheim as I live nearer the Ocean. Higher AM and PM due to the Marine Layer. Heats up and dries out during the day, so it goes from say mid 60%s to mid 7o%sChange in humidity? Not only atmospheric but enclosures too (added moisture)
I used to have a weather station from Davis Instruments. It was very accurate, nearly scientific grade equipment. It would log all weather conditions every 4 minutes and keep the log for an entire year.Sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but you can't prove or disprove a correlation between atmospheric pressure and molting without a barometer in the room your tarantulas are in. Molting usually corresponds to changes in seasons which include changes in temperature and/ or rain/ humidity. I'm not saying atmospheric pressure alone isn't a trigger, but you can't assume it is without keeping all other variables at a constant.
Since I don't have a barometer myself to test for changes in atmospheric pressure, I have been able to use my indoor/ outdoor thermometers in my tarantula room to confirm a correlation between changes in temperature as the seasons change here in Texas and when my tarantulas molt. This observation allows me to predict which tarantulas are due for a molt with a reasonable amount of accuracy. Not all of my tarantulas molt on a seasonal schedule, but the majority do. The tarantulas in my collection that have a predictable molting schedule include species of Aphonopelma and Brachypelma both adults and spiderlings. The tarantulas that do not have a predictable molting schedule include species of Grammostola, Euathlus, and Theraphosa. It is interesting to note that the species with predictable molting schedules occur naturally in the northern hemisphere and the ones that do not in the southern hemisphere.
With the tarantulas in my collection with a predictable molting schedule, there are two phases: spring/ early summer and late summer/ fall. When the temperature in my spider room start rising to a temperature of about 80 F in late May to June, the "spring group" stops eating and eventually molts. The "fall group" stops eating and molts when the temperature starts falling from about 85 F to about 70 F. There is no molting activity during the hottest (July-August) and coldest months (January-February) when temperatures in my spider room are steady at around 85 F and 60 F (give or take a few degrees F) respectively.
I also have a thermo-hygrometer which reads temperature and humidity in the same device. I have not seen any correlation between changes in humidity and molting activity, but it is a variable I have not tested for specifically so can't rule it out as a factor. Keeping temperature at a constant to test for only humidity is practically impossible in my situation. Humidity doesn't appear to be a factor in triggering a molting cycle since I never make any attempt to add water to the soil in my tarantula enclosures or let it dry out.
I can corroborate this. They can certainly feel disturbances in climatic conditions. My guess is that they can feel pressure changes, as this comes first, before the storm, along with other parameters.I can't speak for molting but mine seem to get more agitated before a major storm.