Tell me about the "Ephebopus cyanognathus"

[Chris LXXIX]

@Brad Smith What's the issue w/my post you disliked? I didn't write anything that was factually wrong.

Very often a lot of people leave a 'Dislike' rating due to the 'fat fingers' syndrome: not everyone has classy fingers like me, that not even Liberace

 

[viper69]

Very often a lot of people leave a 'Dislike' rating due to the 'fat fingers' syndrome: not everyone has classy fingers like me, that not even Liberace

True, but I can't assume that, hence the question.

 

[Brad Smith]

Your information was correct but IMO you were very rude about getting your point across.This is often a deterrent to new hobbyist,maybe lighten up a bit and practice constructive criticism.

If your information had been incorrect I would've disagreed with your post instead of disliking it

 

[The Grym Reaper]

@The Grym Reaper
As far as I know it is not only cyanognathus that has the urticating hairs on the pedipalps, murinus and rufescens as well...

I did include that in my reply

Type V urticating setae are exclusive to Ephebopus.

 

[dangerforceidle]

I did include that in my reply

Type V urticating setae are exclusive to Ephebopus.

Not VI? Wikipedia lists Ephebopus as having Type V, and quotes "(Marshal and Uetz, 1990)" but looking at the paper describing the type specimens on the World Spider Catalog, West & Marshall, 2000, Type VI is noted (and they quote the same paper as wiki).

Type VI urticating hairs (Marshall & Uetz. 1990) in a dense pad on the prolateral face of the palpal femur.

**edit**

Found this which should clear it up: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/zool/v30n4/v30n4a06.pdf. Seems the paper on Ephebopus from West and Marshall incorrectly identified the type.

 

[Minty]

Your information was correct but IMO you were very rude about getting your point across.This is often a deterrent to new hobbyist,maybe lighten up a bit and practice constructive criticism.

If your information had been incorrect I would've disagreed with your post instead of disliking it

I think you’ve had a sense of humour failure, to be honest.

 

[Brad Smith]

Could be....its hard to detect sarcasm through text at times....either way it's not a big deal....it was a dislike on a post.....hardly a reason to go on and on.

 

[Andrea82]

I did include that in my reply

Type V urticating setae are exclusive to Ephebopus.

I need to up my comprehensive reading skills...