Tarantulas Feeding through Evolution??

Drachenjager

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
3,509
Vipers have fangs that probably could break through a hard outer exoskeleton but after which it would not be able to make a meal of the insides of the insect. Arachnids can due to the different feeding style.
actually i am sure that the venom would liquify the inners of an insect but the sanke would swallow it hole. also Tarantulas dont suck the innards out of the feeders. In fact i seldom find any left overs in my T tanks , until i fed large roaches lol then i found some. but they do masticate the prey .
 

kasai

Arachnopeon
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
9
Guys guys! I think what Steph is trying to figure out here is if, despite the fact that they are capable of eating mice and rodents, if they are more specialized to hunt and capture inverts... which, according to most tests on venom is certainly true... but they are also very capable of killing and eating mice, small birds, and small reptiles- DEPENDING ON THE SPECIES AND SIZE.

So, yes, and no, to Steph's question. Yes, they are specialized, however because they can, have, and will certainly hunt, kill, and eat small vertibrates when the oppertunity arises (as tarantulas are indeed oppertunistic hunters).

But jeez, seems you guys are too (oppertunistic hunters), you certainly seem to jump on Steph! Is there any reason for this? :?
 

zimbu

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 26, 2006
Messages
141
Tarantulas have large fangs primarily to break through and penetrate an exoskeleton. They also have special enzymes that breakdown and digest the inside of an exoskeleton…. am I right? So by evolution they are primarily meant to eat insects with hard exoskeletons. Ok you guys go with it and tell me what you think.


Steph
If you look at more primitive Chelicerates, their mouthparts are generally clawlike, with the second last segment containing the fixed "thumb" and the last segment acting as the moveable "finger". Since Chelicerates cannot eat solid food (with the exception of the Opilionids), the mouthparts adapted for tearing and mashing are an effective, if not the most efficient, way of extracting edible liquid from food items.

If you look at a variety of major taxa within the Chelicerates, many of them have evoled secondary means of masticating their food to facilitate their liquid diet. For example, horseshoe crabs have a ventral "food groove" which is comprised of spiked coxa which grind their food as it nears their mouth, scorpions have venom to help break down their prey's tissues, and solifugids simply have massive chelicera to grind their prey to a pulp.

Arachnids on the other hand, have evolved so their once chelate (pincerlike) chelicera are now jackknife shaped, unsuitable for grasping and tearing prey. They do however have venom glands which are an extremely effective way of reducing their prey to liquid. So personally, I believe their piercing fangs are not an adaptation for eating arthropods so much as they are an effective venom delivery system. However, at the time this evolved they certainly had an exclusively arthropod based diet, because no other group of animals had yet moved onto land where arachnids evolved. Since arachnids first evolved on land, many other species have colonized the land as well (including vertebrates), and spiders are just as willing to hunt them.



Oh and actually Viper venom is quite similar to spider venom in that it helps break down the prey's tissues. It facilitates the digestive process up quite a bit in that group of snakes, which is one of the reasons that vipers can live in colder climates then many other snakes.
 

rattler420

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
51
i beleive any creature with fangs evolved with them mearly as a way to get thier venom into thier prey. thats why a T's fang so closely resembles a front fanged snakes, its the most efficient way of injecting venom.
 

kasai

Arachnopeon
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
9
If you look at more primitive Chelicerates, their mouthparts are generally clawlike, with the second last segment containing the fixed "thumb" and the last segment acting as the moveable "finger". Since Chelicerates cannot eat solid food (with the exception of the Opilionids), the mouthparts adapted for tearing and mashing are an effective, if not the most efficient, way of extracting edible liquid from food items.

If you look at a variety of major taxa within the Chelicerates, many of them have evoled secondary means of masticating their food to facilitate their liquid diet. For example, horseshoe crabs have a ventral "food groove" which is comprised of spiked coxa which grind their food as it nears their mouth, scorpions have venom to help break down their prey's tissues, and solifugids simply have massive chelicera to grind their prey to a pulp.

Arachnids on the other hand, have evolved so their once chelate (pincerlike) chelicera are now jackknife shaped, unsuitable for grasping and tearing prey. They do however have venom glands which are an extremely effective way of reducing their prey to liquid. So personally, I believe their piercing fangs are not an adaptation for eating arthropods so much as they are an effective venom delivery system. However, at the time this evolved they certainly had an exclusively arthropod based diet, because no other group of animals had yet moved onto land where arachnids evolved. Since arachnids first evolved on land, many other species have colonized the land as well (including vertebrates), and spiders are just as willing to hunt them.



Oh and actually Viper venom is quite similar to spider venom in that it helps break down the prey's tissues. It facilitates the digestive process up quite a bit in that group of snakes, which is one of the reasons that vipers can live in colder climates then many other snakes.


Beautiful answer, very informative! :D :clap:
 

Drachenjager

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
3,509
But jeez, seems you guys are too (oppertunistic hunters), you certainly seem to jump on Steph! Is there any reason for this? :?
i am sorry but i suppose i dont understand this statement. It seems i only saw one person do anythign that resembled "jumping on Steph" . and I dont think that was actually the intention, but i cold be wrong.
If you ask a question, and think you have the answer , you shoudl be prepaired for others to have a differant answer. Of course there is absoulty no reason to be rude about it.
 

zimbu

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 26, 2006
Messages
141
Beautiful answer, very informative! :D :clap:
heh, thanks, I just took a year long invertebrate zoology course as part of my Zoology major... I'm still kinda used to giving essay format answers in response to any question anybody asks of me.
 

verry_sweet

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
569
Yes Kasai that’s exactly what I was trying to get at but I didn’t feel attacked in any way….Thank you for the concern though :)

I was thinking more about this while doing dishes and tarantulas must have been so successful with surviving for this long because they are opportunistic. When insect’s numbers are down they can eat vertebrates and the other way around. I think I get it now

Animals that are specialized to one food source will suffer if there food supply drops massively eventually even leading to extinction.
 

Drachenjager

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
3,509
Yes Kasai that’s exactly what I was trying to get at but I didn’t feel attacked in any way….Thank you for the concern though :)

I was thinking more about this while doing dishes and tarantulas must have been so successful with surviving for this long because they are opportunistic. When insect’s numbers are down they can eat vertebrates and the other way around. I think I get it now

Animals that are specialized to one food source will suffer if there food supply drops massively eventually even leading to extinction.
yep and extinction sux,
and Stef is too sweet to attack :p
 

Quizzler

Arachnopeon
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
18
Canines are for tearing meat into pieces, tarantulas do not eat like that
 

AfterTheAsylum

Arachnodemon
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
674
Tarantula venom has peptides that act against vertebrates. I guess that's all I need to say. It's too late for me to be talking.

Drachenjager, rock on.
 

Brian S

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
May 29, 2004
Messages
6,526
A tarantula is an opportunistic predator that will attack and kill anything it can over power for food. I wouldnt say that a T's fangs are NOT specialized to eat inverts only however inverts would certainly be the prey of choice not due to design of the fangs but more due to size. It takes a pretty good sized T to handle a mouse or even a lizard.
 
Top