- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 962
Very good point, but still.......
David Cooper
David Cooper
Again, there's no such species as Scolopendra gigantea robusta... the pede in the pic looks more like an S. viridicornis, but I've recently become almost apathetic about identification through coloring and markings. It's hard to know what it is for sure...Originally posted by gongyles
Then again i looked at his leggs and they seem to be banded, if it's correct that the galapagoenis is a other name for Scolopendra gigantea robusta, i've never seen a gigantea species that has banded leggs, can someone clear this one out :? :? :?
Originally posted by Cooper
Very good point, but still.......
David Cooper
No one said there couldn't be one, just that it's unlikely and that not a shred of evidence supporting it exists.Originally posted by Cooper
Finally some peple are starting to see my side, if they do grow till they die, what is stopping some from living a bit longer and growing bigger? f someone could prove that there is a 30" specimen at the bug museum, that would be great. There is always some freaky things in species that are different, like that tarantula with two abdomens or that guy that was like 9 feet tall. Who's to say that their couldn't be some freaky mutant giant centipede?
i can't express myself to clearly in englisch,... but why does everybody assumes it's a galapagoensis that looks like a viridicornis instead of realising it IS a viridicornis ????THIS THING LOOKED LIKE A MONSTROSITY FORM OF THE VIRIDACORNUS