Genus Lampropelma

GoTerps

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
2,114
Hi Wade,

I believe they should just be called Lampropelma sp. "Borneo" though.

Edit... but very nice, and glad you got them :)

Eric
 
Last edited:

syndicate

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,494
nice one!where did u get these from if ya dont mind me asking?
 

Wadew

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
417
There are a couple breeders in denmark who have been successful as of late

Wade
 

EDED

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
549
cool species,

i hope you bought enough to start a breeding stock in the US
 

syndicate

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,494
Wadew said:
There are a couple breeders in denmark who have been successful as of late

Wade
yeah ive notcied these for sale on alot of the euro forums if u get any more let me know im local
 

Bearo

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
462
GoTerps said:
Hi Wade,

I believe they should just be called Lampropelma sp. "Borneo" though.

Edit... but very nice, and glad you got them :)

Eric
We call them Lampropelma sp. "Orange fringed" (yes, you read right, the europeans are using common names ;) hehe, I dont know why though)
there are many species that could be referd to with the name Lampropelma sp. "Borneo"

They are very easy to confuse with the "Haplopelma doriae", wich are also sold in Europe now
 
Last edited:

GoTerps

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
2,114
We call them Lampropelma sp. "Orange fringed" (yes, you read right, the europeans are using common names hehe, I dont know why though)there are many species that could be referd to with the name Lampropelma sp. "Borneo"
What other species are you refering too? that could be confused.... just curious!

Eric
 

T.Raab

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
432
Bearo said:
We call them Lampropelma sp. "Orange fringed" (yes, you read right, the europeans are using common names ;) hehe, I dont know why though)
Hi,

its not a "common name", its the species with a suffix. ;)
 

Bearo

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
462
T.Raab said:
Hi,

its not a "common name", its the species with a suffix. ;)
hhmmm... I would say common name within a suffix then ;)
Are there rules to what you can put i a suffix? could you call a species ex. Avicularia sp. "blueback pinktoe with white hair" or where do we draw the line?

Eric>> I see now that I made a mistake, I really ment that there are more Ornithoctoninae on Borneo. But I think there are others speculated into Genus Lampropelma, like Lamp. sp. "Kalimantan"
Or is that the same as L. sp. "Orange fringed" or O. G. sp. "Haplopelma doriae" now?

Also if Cyriopagopus sp. "blue" (Malaysia, Singapore) would turn out to be L. violaceopes, then C. sp. "blue/black Borneo" could also be called L. sp. "Borneo", or the blue Cyrio. from Borneo maby?
Everything is a mess hehe

Anyway, what is a Lampropelma right now? ;)
(Anybody got news about how Volker is doing with the papers btw?)
 
Last edited:

T.Raab

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
432
Hi Bearo,

i meant genus with suffix. ;) ... My fault.
 

GoTerps

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
2,114
Hey Bearo,

Also if Cyriopagopus sp. "blue" (Malaysia, Singapore) would turn out to be L. violaceopes, then C. sp. "blue/black Borneo" could also be called L. sp. "Borneo"
No, I don't think that's what would happen. But maybe I'm thinking about this wrong.

Simon established Lampropelma in 1892 (L. nigerrimum) and Cyriopagopus in 1887 (C. paganus)

Now, strictly for the sake of argument, lets make 2 assumptions. First, that the genus Lampropelma, sensu Simon 1892, is a valid genus... and Second, that C. paganus is/was actually what we today consider Cyriopagopus.

Assuming the above to be true (Edit...and thinking about it now they don't matter much to this specific arguement), then if Cyriopagopus sp. "blue" does indeed prove to be what Abraham described as Lampropelma violaceopes in 1924, then all that needs to be done is to move L. violaceopes to the genus Cyriopagopus.

So, in response to your comment, there would be no scenario in which the "black" Cyriopagopus from Borneo would be called Lampropelma "anything".

PS... I didn't forget about your request! I'll get back with you soon!

Eric
 
Last edited:

T.Raab

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
432
Hi,

the genus Lampropelma and Cyriopagopus are atm valid. The keyfeature of Lampropelma is the brush of hairs on the the femur I and II (I'm not sure if the palps possess them too). Cyriopagopus lack this feature.

Like Eric pointed out corretly:
If the Cyriopagopus sp. "blue" would be identical to Lampropelma violaceopes sensu Abraham, this species would be transfered to the genus Cyriopagopus.
 

syndicate

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,494
wasnt Lampropelma violaceopes previously Haplopelma robustum?
also these arent aboreal correct?
 

T.Raab

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
432
Hi,
syndicate said:
wasnt Lampropelma violaceopes previously Haplopelma robustum?
no, Lampropelma violaceopes was never a synonym of Haplopelma robustum.

Haplopelma robustum was described by Embrik Strand in 1907. Due the WWII were most of the Strand museum material in Stuttgart destroyed. So proably also the tpye of H. robustum.
The most description done by Strand are also useless in moderen taxonomy. This means, that it is very hard or even unpossible to ID a Haplopelma robustum proper.

You shouldn't mix the hobby/market stuff with scientific stuff. Maybe there were sold some H. robustum in the past, but does that mean that they were REAL ones (sensu Strand)?

Small example: If i sell a dog and call it cat, is it then a cat or a dog?
Same is in the hobby. A dealer gets new stuff, looks at it and decide to call it a name. The most dealer do not give the stuff first to a scientific working person for proper ID.
 

Bearo

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
462
aahh ok..

So then the name L. violaceopes would be null and C. sp. "blue" (the real L. violaceopes) would become a described Cyriopagopus species.. and this because its 100% that C. sp. "blue" is a Cyrio. and does not posses those brushes?
But L. nigerrimum will still be valid offcourse..

my fault, thanks for the right info guys :)
 

T.Raab

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
432
Hi,

IF Cyriopagopus is the same as Lampropelma violaceopes, the species L. violaceopes would be transfered to the genus Cyriopagopus.
 

syndicate

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,494
thanks for clearing that up.i read that somewhere.also hey are the L. violaceopes aboreal?
 

GoTerps

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
2,114
Beautiful. They need to get these in the states.
They've been here for awhile... a quick search shows they're available from at least 2 sources right now.

PM for info if you're interested.

Eric
 
Top