- Joined
- Aug 25, 2004
- Messages
- 506
Makes my blood boil. He’s spectacularly ignorant and his interpretation of the section he’s discussing is pure invention on his part. He doesn’t even address the changes to the injurious species provision, and he’s reading the “white list” provision the way a small child would interpret bad behavior on the part of a parent.Thoughts?
Literally not a single thing he said was true.