my apologies then. I thought that you were saying that I was lying to you for some reason. I wasnt being sarcastic. You have obviously done your research.I said that you claimed it because I had no grounds to validate whether you were currently keeping it or if you had it at the time of writing your profile but have since gotten rid of it. I'm not trying to get personal here. Checking your profile and referring you to Opencongress.org was research in of itself. Do I have to link you to a bunch of crap to prove myself?
I am not going into HR669 with you or What again. It doesn't work.
TBH
Unfortunately though, you do have to provide sources. this is like any good paper. I can doubt you all I want, but if you want to change my mind you have to show me other, very intelligent and accredited people who believe the things you do. In this case you just have to show me what i'm voting on.
You've never had someone walk up to you and ask you to sign a petition to create jobs? You ask what exactly is the vote. They say "to put in a casino." well that's not exactly what you said in the first place. In a perfect world I could believe anything you tell me. In this world you need sources.