At first I thought it was a C Crawshayi but I deleted my post since I read the T kicked hairs, this T looks more OW to me than NW. The pics posted remind me a lot fo these pics:
Black crackling on caraplace and knee striping are similar to the pics posted,along with the "rusted" spinnerettes
![]()
![]()
I'm sorry if my post went at you for saying that, I know you clarified yourself, in no way was my post meant to show that you didn't correct yourself as you did. I'm sorry for the confusing postI'll say for the last time, THIS spider has never kicked uraticating hairs at me, i apoligize if i even said that, but it DOESNT. It's OW. it also has no thick legs, theya re small and thin, more like that of a chromatus of mine....
It's OW and DOESNT kick hairs....it does not kick hairs...
I'm sorry if my post went at you for saying that, I know you clarified yourself, in no way was my post meant to show that you didn't correct yourself as you did. I'm sorry for the confusing post
I'm not clear on this, but has it ever kicked hairs? ;PI'll say for the last time, THIS spider has never kicked uraticating hairs at me, i apoligize if i even said that, but it DOESNT. It's OW. it also has no thick legs, theya re small and thin, more like that of a chromatus of mine....
It's OW and DOESNT kick hairs....it does not kick hairs...
so wait this is confusing, does it kick hairs or does it not? Scorp guy says its OW but mistercurls says it has kicked hairs which is it?
I think its an abused Aphonopelma seemanni in need of a molt.
Tell that to my collection of Chilobrachys! All this time and they never new they had an identity crisis.The pics are really blurry, but this T does seem to have rust-colored spinnerettes, which means it IS an A. seemani.
Only females of this species have the thickened leg IV. Males (immature and mature) don't. Of course, I'm not suggesting that the spider in question could be C. crawshayi.C. crawshayi have thickend 4th legs and the spider in question doesn't. It can't be a C. crawshayi.
In that case it is highly unlikely to be from the Eumenophorinae subfamily - these stridulate extremely loudly and are never shy of doing so (except for one species). Also rules out many larger Selenocosmiinae.Also i have yet to hear it stridulate if that helps anyone
That rules out the Ornithoctoninae and Harpactirinae (Harpactirella excepted).Also there is no feathery hairs on the chelicerae
That rules out almost all of the Eumenophorinae genera.The posterior pair of sigilla are on the outer edge of the strernum i think. thats what it looks like.
I'm assuming you mean lateral and dorsal spines on the tibia and metatarsus? In which case that rules out all Eumenophorinae again (and I think Selenocosmiinae).Also on the back legs it has those spines like A. seemani have and other spiders that ive seen that have them if that helps any.
Now that does sound like a seemanni characteristic.The abdoman looks to be a little lighter on the bottom also.