- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,255
No way! I thought it was a bigfoot!I thought you said it was a yeti:?
now you say it was a sasquatch, WTH was it,
it was probably a "bare" sherpa then
No way! I thought it was a bigfoot!I thought you said it was a yeti:?
now you say it was a sasquatch, WTH was it,
it was probably a "bare" sherpa then
Yup..that's the same thing!!! LMAO!No way! I thought it was a bigfoot!
Noo, lets be clear,ready...Sasquatch is in NA alias bigfoot.They're the same thing.
Then who's the abominable snowman?Yeti is in Napal and he makes snow cones with yellow snow and leaves them for tourists by the trail head.
Yeti's cousin that lives almost to the top of everest, he used to live at a lower elevation but got banished for eating all the yellow snow cones.Then who's the abominable snowman?
-Sean
isn't that the Skunk ape?No he didn't.
He's just the Uncle no one talks about.
I heard this story. I also heard they were eating pop rocks and drinking diet coke with Elvis and Bigfoot but It wasnt at the olive garden it was on a deserted Island with D.B. Cooper and when they were done they went skinny dipping with the loch ness monster All before being abducted by Aliens
LOL,
It was the skunk ape, Rochelle has her big foots crossed, shes a mess
This wouldn't be the best way of determining if it was valid or not (it's a hoax, obviously, I'm just referring to this criterion). Most scientists don't even make a distinction between "poisonous" and "venomous" in their day to day vernacular and note-taking. Heck, J.G. Lewis, arguably the world's foremost expert on centipedes, in his book "The Biology of Centipedes", called their maxillipeds "poison claws".this is not true it can never be true because spiders are not POISONOUS they are venomous:? :? :? :?
In my presentations I tell people that a Poison is a toxin delivered by ingestion or absorption and venom is a toxin delivered hypodermically by means of a spine,stinger or fang. I say that not with animosity but like you say a "tidbit of info, but its no big deal in the grand scheme of thingsThis wouldn't be the best way of determining if it was valid or not (it's a hoax, obviously, I'm just referring to this criterion). Most scientists don't even make a distinction between "poisonous" and "venomous" in their day to day vernacular and note-taking. Heck, J.G. Lewis, arguably the world's foremost expert on centipedes, in his book "The Biology of Centipedes", called their maxillipeds "poison claws".
So yeah, it's a nice tidbit to impress friends with at cocktail parties, but it's not a useful distinction.
^^ This is the way it should be done... unfortunately a lot of people as soon as they hear someone "screw up" and "use the wrong word" they're like "oooh, ooh, I know something you don't knowwwww!!!"In my presentations I tell people that a Poison is a toxin delivered by ingestion or absorption and venom is a toxin delivered hypodermically by means of a spine,stinger or fang. I say that not with animosity but like you say a "tidbit of info, but its no big deal in the grand scheme of things
Yeah, and some languages as well. For example my language uses only one word for the two English words "poisonous" and "venomous".Most scientists don't even make a distinction between "poisonous" and "venomous" in their day to day vernacular and note-taking.