Because of a recent paper written by Smith and Jacobi, synonymising Cyriopagopus and Haplopelma. The paper is pending WSC review to make the change official.
The paper fails to recognize the gender of Cyriopagopus making it Cyriopagopus lividus. That and many other issues makes me believe it might be rejected instead of entered in the WSC.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.