- Joined
- May 29, 2008
- Messages
- 232
I hate ice spiders I was just wondering why you didn't put it on there to see if anybody liked it. I wasn't saying I liked ice spiders I think the exact opposite of ice spiders.
OK u had me scared there for a minute...I hate ice spiders I was just wondering why you didn't put it on there to see if anybody liked it. I wasn't saying I liked ice spiders I think the exact opposite of ice spiders.
Haven't seen the film for a long time, but I do remember it.Seriously... Has no one here but me and one other person ever heard of Tarantula?
Yup, that was one of his earliest appearances, and oddly enough, he was the one who killed the spider!Haven't seen the film for a long time, but I do remember it.You know Clint Eastwood was in the movie, right?
Tarantula TARANTULA! Tomato TAMATO! Yeah those Arachnophobia Arachnids were pretty amazing, but none of them became a hundred ft tall like Tarantula did!I've heard of Tarantula (would TARANTULA! would a better title?), and saw a poster going on eBay (theatrical 36x40). Was thinking of getting it, but decided, nah.
yeah, the tarantulas on Arachnophobia did a lot of things.. like mated with house spiders and jumped 10 ft. in the air.
Not sure where you get this info from, but it was not a ground-breaking film. Yes you could say it was a bit advanced for the day...I've been wondering that for years! I don't know wat T they used. By the way, believe it or not, Tarantula was a ground-breaking film of its time as it popularized special make-up effects and the matte effect (which eventually became known as green-screen or blue-screen)
Must someone always destroy my childhood dreams? Seriously guys, so maybe Tarantula DIDN'T "popularize" SPME or matte effects. But it used them more extensively than many other films. For instance, the make-up effects were actually more advanced than many other make-up effects used before it. Through a combination of masks, prosthetics, and make-up the decaying faces of the scientist and the deformations of the test subjects was achieved. Also, more advanced methods than just matte paintings had to be used for the Tarantula's shadow and the background. Again, these mattes actually have a more perfect look to them then those in wizard of oz and gone with the wind, and before anyone asks, yes I have seen both of those movies as well as many more who have used these techniques. One more thing, the mattes used in the film were far more advanced as they were able to capture distance (if one pays close enough attention) and the tarantulas proportions in the film grow as the fictional creature itself does. So you got me with it not being ground-breaking, but it deserves more credit than being called "a bit advanced for the day..."Not sure where you get this info from, but it was not a ground-breaking film. Yes you could say it was a bit advanced for the day...
It most definitely did not popularize SPME or matte effects. It was one in a long list. "The thief of Baghdad" came almost 15 years before Tarantula. Also a form a blue screening was already being used in B&W. "The wizard of Oz" & "Gone with the Wind" used this techniques with Matte paintings a good 25 years before the film Tarantula. My background is not "traveling matte" but rather SPME and the film Tarantula is much farther down the list of ground-breaking make-up effects than it is in the "traveling matte" realm.![]()
You're right Ottawaherp, someone did have to type that and I'm glad someone did... Have a nice day!If your going to post a poll, try to be patient.
I would much rather read other peoples answers, and not the contiuous annoying "please vote now", "if you know anyone who has'nt voted", etc
Yes I know, I probably got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, but it is still annoying.
There somebody had to type it out.
BTW - I picked Arachnophobia
With that aside, does anyone else want to vote or know anyone else who hasn't voted?You're right Ottawaherp, someone did have to type that and I'm glad someone did... Have a nice day!