- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
- Messages
- 738
Here is a female I caught this year, eating a dubia nymph. You can see her egg case in the background.

Bring in a new bug and it will have an ecological shifting effect. They may be established now, but they are none-the-less an invasive species. These are my sources.Saying they're invasive is a very harsh term indeed. While they are introduced...they are by no means invasive...unless you're a japanese beetle. To my knowledge I don't know of any insects species that are endangered or threatened as a result of some mantids.
Possibly you are correct, but I feel we have the same defintion--mine is only strictor. "causes environmental harm" is a relative idea. I've posted sources which attribute top down trophic cascades and shifts in abundance of orthopterans and in one case an arachnid species to their introduction. If you define "harm to the environment" as harm to environment facets that humans use then you would be absolutely correct. If orthopterans arent there then grass overgrows. If this happens nematode diversity can shift...and so on and so forth.I think your definition of invasive differs than ours.
According to the National Invasive Species Council, an invasive species is defined as a species that is nonnative (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration AND whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.
Yes, the European, Chinese, and Iris oratoria are introduced, nonnative to the U.S. but they fail to meet the other criteria.
A better term may be "exotic".
Here in Indiana I find both the introduced Chinese mantid and the native Carolina mantid (Stagmomantis carolina, in equally abundant numbers.
Sorry, didn't mean it as a general rule. Just meant that it does happen. Males can even still fertilize a females eggs during mating after the female has taken his head!Males dont always get killed by females. That's a stubborn myth. While it DOES happen, occasionally I might add, males usually get to court with plenty of females before dying.
Ok, i agree with you a bit more. I have read studies that suggest that several mantids can coinhabit the same space and fill different niches. I think that by the definition you posted that they are in fact invasive since they have a negative impact on the environment, however I obviously agree that their effect is not as negative as, say, the emerald ash borer. However, I dont think that you could ask any naturalist whether bringing them in has a positive effect and have them give you a positive answer. Introductions like these happen all the time and the summation of their effects is large. Fine, maybe they are more comparable to fleas (i would disagree strongly) but what happens when you get alot of flees....? Like I said, coupled with all the factors listed above, is why we're loosing 30,000 species per year to extinction. People have to realize the effects of what they do.I agree with the "relative" part, maybe I can use the analogy of comparing a flea bite to a shark bite, they may both cause some harm, but which is significant (assuming the flea is disease free of course).
The exotic mantids may have been considered as invasive if they had caused a significant decline in the number of pollinators or to the native Carolina mantid, but luckily they seem to inhabitat different niches so they do not compete with each other, at least here in Indiana.
I find the Chinese mantids in the fields and brush, and the Carolinas in shrubs, trees and on the sides of buildings.
I think that in order to call something "invasive", there must also be widespread agreement in regards to the negative impact, or by "popular demand".
The eyespots indicate that it is a European mantis, Mantis religiosaI have no clue what kind it is, but it does have huge "eye-spots" on both front legs.