- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
- Messages
- 2,239
radicalmentia is probably correct on the use of multiple tarantulas. Even dog movies are known to use multiple dogs to play the key character who knows infinitely more stunts than a single dog could ever be taught.
As silly and off-topic as this argument is, I'm sure it can be solved by just having someone check the credits for Ye Olde "No Animals Were Harmed In The Making Of This Picture" Disclaimere.how do you know it wasn't harmed, you can't say that for sure.
I'm probably one of the most defensive people as far as animal rights go, but you do realize movies have special effects right? They go through and cut,clip, edit the movie. Which VERY well may mean, and probable is wih animal cruelty laws, that the "tarantula" that was thrown off wasn't real and edited in.when the little boy picked it up that definetly wasn't safe handling, then when it was on the guys face and he picks it up and throws it that is just uncalled for, A.seemani when he throws it you see the underside of the T and it looks just like an A.seemani
I'd heard that too. They tried the scream while it was on his face, but the spider crunched up terrified, so they had to wait until it calmed down again, and inserted the scream after shooting.I read somewhere where they did not insert the scream audio until after the scene was shot.
According to Daniel Stern, the scream was real. The animal handlers told him that the tarantula had no ears and couldn't hear. They told him that it would not mind unless he made sudden movements.I'd heard that too. They tried the scream while it was on his face, but the spider crunched up terrified, so they had to wait until it calmed down again, and inserted the scream after shooting.