- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 11,497
Let's just give this sidetrack of the OP a bottom line. In my perfect world every person who purchases a gun for sporting purposes must attend 2 graphics intensive hour or two long courses.You're right, my head was in city living, there are certainly places where its not criminal, I was much too broad in my statement....also I was focusing more on the maiming, which I would generally consider as a "deliberate intentional act, not that the op would fall into this, it would not.
Much of my state is woods and lakes, and those people popping animals illegally don't have the luxury of our law enforcement looking the other way in normal cases, but there definitely are such areas, my bad.
Shooting something would often be the humane way to end a life. Varmint control is a far cry from maiming or neglecting an animal kept as a "pet" or even livestock IMO.
The first, from incident to final recovery, trauma, first and secondary aid, intervention, surgery, restructuring, physical and mental therapy and rehabilitation of a gunshot wound, taking the gun owner to be on a grand tour of the effect of a bullet on a living body.
The second, a similar course showing the effects of lead on a living animal either through traumatic infliction or ingestion. Diagnosis, debilitating effects and what is required in order to recover to 90% of health level. The course would center on the introduction of lead into the environment through hunting.
No, I'm not a fluffy bunny loving PETA supporter. I've killed far more animals with firearms than the average person in the US does in their lifetime. I'm advocating common sense and awareness of the consequences of actions. From improper treatment due to lack of knowledge, apathy or just plain laziness in a pet shop to the 20,000+ elephants killed every year. If you are going to pull a trigger, you should be aware of what that bullet is going to do. Be fully responsible for your actions.
Last edited: