- Joined
- Aug 10, 2004
- Messages
- 88
Unknown speciment
A. crassicaudas can be black like that? I thought crassicauda looks more like A. australis, in fact I heard from a number of people its hard to tell the difference between A. australis and A. crassicauda...errit said:That is a very nice one. I also think bicolor. if there would be a doubt than i would say very maybe A. Crassicauda
Crassicuada's are larger than bicolors!!!!423 said:All the crassicaudas I've seen (not that many) has been red in the coloring. I don't know but I would still say A. bicolor, can't see why not.
They are actually the same size ;oRaZeDaHeLL666 said:Crassicuada's are larger than bicolors!!!!
Ya their chela is bulkier, but they are still the same size...RaZeDaHeLL666 said:I have seen pics of many, all from keepers! and they all look a bit bigger, with much bigger pedipalps than bicolors!
Yes it is. But A. Australis has a bigger (fatter) tail. And there are a few less obvious differences.RaZeDaHeLL666 said:A. Australis is usally confused with A. amoreuxi