Im not expert but im pretty sure even male G.pulchra are not so fluffy. Generally the species has a sleek and shiny appearance without the long hairs on the legs.
Could be wrong though, but i can understand why the OP asked for a second opinion
I have a pair of G. Grossa and i would agree. It didnt look like a Pulchra but after a longer closer look i would suspect also to be female Grossa. But it being female is just my guess. Its definately big n healthy. No need for gloves.
I have a pair of G. Grossa and i would agree. It didnt look like a Pulchra but after a longer closer look i would suspect also to be female Grossa. But it being female is just my guess. Its definately big n healthy. No need for gloves.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
