If you have a molt you can at least narrow the identification down to the genus by examining the spermatheca. Why do you think it can only be one of the two mentioned species though?
If you have a molt you can at least narrow the identification down to the genus by examining the spermatheca. Why do you think it can only be one of the two mentioned species though?
It's caused a bit of a tussle between two breeders here in SA. We're waiting for a molt, but I had the T here with me to photograph as "A chalcodes" and something didn't look right to me so I went and did some online image research but this specimen did not look like any images for A chalcodes. So I kept looking until I found L polycuspulatus, and all the descriptions for this sp matched what I believe I was seeing in this specimen in the photos. I know it's not accurate, but for a best guess scenario, and purely on physical ID, I think it's L polycuspulatus - purely my opinion based on what I see. Was just wondering what others might think based on these photos specifically.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
