Sadly i am leaning towards a male as well as i think i see a 'dot', though could be glare. I also think the little guy is supper leggy and lean so tempted to say his long legs are indicative of a male as well (or is it too early for proportions to come into play?). I couldn't get a clear shot last night but will try again today after work and see if i can post a new one - silly me didn't realize that the HDR function was off when i snapped the first one.
Males only become leggy when they mature, so it's completely irrelevant in immature specimens. And poecilotheria are a leggy genus. Immature males (unless they possess sexual dimorphism before maturity) will look exactly like their female counterparts.
Very interesting and good to know, thank you! So I've taken a second shot with my phone and although better than the first still doesn't look very good. I will post again and perhaps I could get some thoughts on that one
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.