Why do some species live so short?

omni

Arachnobaron
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
382
I've kept only a small handful of my collection until they passed from old age but was thinking recently about general lifespans of different sp, how it relates to the morphological differences from keeping 92 long-term from 17 species. One thing I've studied as T's are an ongoing research for me, is that body type can be an indicator of general longevity, though you can extend that to be longer than avg. accepted years with light feeding and conditions as it ages.

generalities that my own personal experience backs up for growth and lifespan of 92 T's:
fuzzy or wildly haired sp. do not live as long. They come from mostly very humid and hot climates, having long erect setae to disperse heat thru surface area. These sp. tend to be very active, most arboreal and many are quite colorful.
A. Avic about 8 yrs max. T. albo 11-14 yrs

Dwarf and smaller sp. have the shortest spans of all T's. They are very active, mature in fewer molts, tho relatively they are not at all fast to reach maturity. I've kept E. scrofa in 2 locale varieties for only 8 & 10 yrs. 1 MM scrofa was mature @ 4 yrs, hooked out and passed in 4 weeks. Cyriocosmus F's may live to be only 6 +/- > E. scrofa 8-10yrs

smooth haired terrestrials are just about THE longest lived T's, incl Acanthoscurria, Aphonopelma, Grammastola, and couple others. T's with setae that lie flat, oven very dense, use their hair as shield against elements like dirt and rain, protection from abrasion and conserve their humidity, live in variable climates that often go cool and dry and actually don't like high humidity. Desert sp have very tight, short setae, are almost always fossorial or opportunistic burrowers. They tend to eat and get fat to store up for periods when no prey is available. Activity is low, they may go off eating for months or more. you can expect these usually calmer, slow moving T's to live more than 15 - 18 years. They grow the slowest of all sp., maturing past 5 or 6 years depending on feeding. Selenocosmia might fit this, but maybe better they fit larger faster growing types than NW terrestrials.

near bald T's or extremely short setae tend to only be in caves, they are fossorial mostly and are strict ambush predators, very fast and are medium size or smaller, slow to get size, but actually are mature relatively sooner than most terrestrials. Prey is not plentiful so they must be fast for defense, have more potent venom and since they dont have the layer of long setae, need more protection. Not as long lived

Large, fast growing sp. are eating machines, and widely variable how active they are and how long lived. I've kept Phormictopus cancerides and watched a couple F's get to 6"+ in 2.5-3yrs, 1 girl reached 7" by age 5 and is now 11 living with my buddy. They are leggy, have both tight and loose setae, can be colorful, very active opportunity hunters. They don't have bright coloration, but a cast or sheen to them overall within the genus, not very different from Pamphobeteus which are bigger and faster growing, and more brightly colored esp for males. I've no experience with long-term Pampho keeping, but suspect both genus' do not live more than 10-12 yrs based on activity, coloration and growth rate.

This not definitive; exceptions esp. within genus are common. These are only sp. that I've kept long term, and not enough individuals to be entirely accurate statistically. Generally I've observed these over 5 or 6 years with each specimen and I get used to how to mature faster or keep a favorite sp. longer. I'm only trying to build a general idea what makes T types live longer than some others.

One example, my 1st T, E. campestratus or Pink Zebra Beauty fits generally in smooth-haired types, terrestrial from variable warm but arid conditions around Ecuador in low to mid elevation. They are tough, slow and possibly get a super long lifespan from behavioral traits. Truly a pet rock, they may not move for days or weeks, expend little energy in advanced age if fed regularly but lightly. old adults do not chase prey. At least my old girl would wait until a cricket passed her face then scoop it up. I got her as 3" WC juvie and she was with me until 2017, 19 years. She molted 5x in that time. Est. lifespan was 23-26 yrs. G. rosea, porteri, and concepcione can commonly reach 20-25 yrs, but it is rare to hear a report beyond 25 years. I don't doubt you could measure a human lifespan with only 2 Rose Hair tarantulas (G. porteri) !!

Please add your experiences with species and thoughts so we can get an idea how long our fav. sp will live. I don't keep many species or even that many now. There's not many resources you can just look up and dealers often have no idea beyond guesses, and certainly don't advertise everything they know in price lists. Most people buy because of looks, some by known temperament. But what about people that want to choose fast growing or long lived? a lot of it is try and see. 6 or 8 yrs later, they wonder why it passed if they made mistkes or ??
 

spideyspinneret78

Arachnoprince
Active Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2019
Messages
1,404
I think that in general a tarantula's (or any other animal's) longevity is more correlated with their metabolic rate instead of specific characteristics like setae for example. I think it really has more to do with an animal's habitat, what food resources are available in that habitat, and the spider's metabolism. For instance, tarantulas that live in very harsh desert climates like G. rosea, have a very slow metabolism and grow slowly, because food is very scarce in general in contrast to an arboreal species that lives in a tropical rainforest. While there are certain physical characteristics that may strongly correlate with this, I think looking at an animal's habitat, prey availability in that environment, and energy expenditure are far better indicators of how long the spider's lifespan might be. Good observations, though! And I think that there are definitely some strong correlations there, since an animal's metabolism certainly impacts its body structure.
 

cold blood

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
13,545
How long they live is most directly related to how fast they grow...fast growers have shorter lifespans, all super long lived species grow very slowly....its common amongst cold blooded creatures.
 

viper69

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
19,083
tho relatively they are not at all fast to reach maturity
My E. sp. Yellow matured in 18 months from a sling!

I don't believe morphological differences have anything to do with longevity.
 

Goopyguy56

Arachnoangel
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
828
Never thought about that. Thanks for posting. I know smaller animals generally live shorter lives than smaller ones. Like elephants vs mice. Like you said, many dwarf t's live shorter lives. I know some species of bats live really long for there size because their telomeres don't shorten. If you don't know what those are just do some research. Basically you lose dna everytime you duplicate dna. Since faster growing t's duplicate dna faster' it makes sense they would expire sooner.
 

Olan

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
862
This is interesting. I think that a major determinant of lifespan is whether they come from tropical locations where they can eat year round (thus higher metabolism) vs. areas that have a winter. The most striking to me is the super-fuzzy Ts not living as long. I think the long setae might have something to do with living in tropical forests, like as a defense against parasites which might be more prevalent there. And therefore, as tropical species, they have faster metabolisms and shorter lives.
I like the deep thinking you’re doing, looking for some underlying system that relates lifespan to lifestyle. It might be no more complex than temperate vs tropical climate. Although there is the complication of small vs large size affecting lifespan. I’ll be thinking more on this myself.
 

Wolfram1

Arachnoprince
Active Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2018
Messages
1,547
Interesting ideas, i would think that like others have already stated, metabolism would be the main factor driving the aging process, likewise fast growth or other energy intensive activities like egg laying, should in theory highten the metabolism as well as demand a higher expenditure of minerals, vitamins, etc. thus taxing the organism further. All this could lead to a shortened lifespan.
Metabolism & morphology are mostly dictated by the environment the species is adapted to and the setae do reflect this adaptation well.

In regards to telomere shortening it sadly isnt as straight forward as "it shortens with age". Sadly i couldnt find my study notes or any articles regarding this but i am certain that there are organisms that do the opposite, their telomeres lenghten with age, they age all the same though.
Most studie were done on mammals and birds and even there they found that while telomeres shorten with age they dont do so consistently enough to infer age from telomere lengh.

there is a nice nature article on this problem with telomere shortening and age:
Horn, T., Robertson, B. & Gemmell, N. The use of telomere length in ecology and evolutionary biology. Heredity 105, 497–506 (2010).

not sure if its allowed to post links here, so the citation will have to suffice.
 

Gavin Sons

Arachnopeon
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
32
Never thought about that. Thanks for posting. I know smaller animals generally live shorter lives than smaller ones. Like elephants vs mice. Like you said, many dwarf t's live shorter lives. I know some species of bats live really long for there size because their telomeres don't shorten. If you don't know what those are just do some research. Basically you lose dna everytime you duplicate dna. Since faster growing t's duplicate dna faster' it makes sense they would expire sooner.
Thata not always the case. I still think it goes back to growth rate. Look at dogs. Big dogs don't live nera as long as small ones. Great danes are lucky to live to be 10 while chihuahuas can live 20 years.
 

Goopyguy56

Arachnoangel
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
828
Thata not always the case. I still think it goes back to growth rate. Look at dogs. Big dogs don't live nera as long as small ones. Great danes are lucky to live to be 10 while chihuahuas can live 20 years.
I think alot of dog breeds have issues due to the amount of inbreeding. Some wild animals like wolves live 20 + years in captivity
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,943
Dogs? Mice? Elephants??? Lets compare apples to apples here. The longest living spider on record is the Australian trap door spider Gaius villosus (Mygalomorphae; Idiopidae) at 43 years. According to the researcher studying it for that long, it was most likely killed by a parasitic wasp. So it could have possibly lived longer. Males of that species have a body length of 28.7 mm and females have a body length of 38.7 mm. So no, small spiders don't necessarily have a shorter lifespan than larger ones.
 

Goopyguy56

Arachnoangel
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
828
Well tell all the biologist they are wrong then. As a biology teacher I know better. There are exceptions, I won't dispute that. Generally speaking larger animals that are larger live longer than smaller species. There are exceptions.
 
Top