What to call them! Centruroides sculpturatus/Centruroides exilicauda

Kathy

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
853
People keep correcting me that they are no longer called c. sculpts, but they will always be c. sculpts to me. The more I read the more confused I get between the difference in names. Maybe someone can explain in Scorpions for Dummies 101 language?
 

tom

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
104
exilicauda versus sculpturatus

Very simply the species name was changed by the scientists proposing a new name for what had been known previously as sculpturatus.Check the literature for Scorpion morphology/ indentification. there are a number of articles written on the subject and can easily be downloaded on the internet.
cheers, Tom
 

Irene B. Smithi

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
520
I'm sticking with C. Sculpts and refuse REFUSE to call them anything else. lol well, other then my little pest lol
 

Michiel

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
3,478
It is really simple people:
Only the population of Baja, California is called C.exilicauda, the rest of the population is called C.sculpturatus. Kathy, your Arizonian specimens are C. sculpturatus.

You see guys, nothing difficult here ;)
 

Aztek

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,733
Yeah.. Baja California, Mexico is still the Exilicauda.

Sculpturus is the rest.


Pretty likely that there's mixed populations out there in captivity.
 

gromgrom

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Messages
1,743
so the gene pool in arizona are different from california? that doesnt make sense

unless you mean theyre the same minus/plus a few genes
 

jayefbe

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1,349
so the gene pool in arizona are different from california? that doesnt make sense

unless you mean theyre the same minus/plus a few genes
There is no gene flow between the Arizona (sculpturatus) and BAJA California (which is part of Mexico, exilicauda) species. Of course they share the majority of the same genes (as they do with us and all other eukaryotes), but they are different species since they are found in reproductively isolated populations and have been separate long enough to warrant separate species classifications.
 

Kathy

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
853
So they ARE different species - so when someone tells me that I am wrong in calling them c. sculpts, I am correct - c. exilicuda is a different species in Baja. Correct? I have money riding on this.....
 

Kathy

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
853
It is really simple people:
Only the population of Baja, California is called C.exilicauda, the rest of the population is called C.sculpturatus. Kathy, your Arizonian specimens are C. sculpturatus.

You see guys, nothing difficult here ;)
See, that does not make sense to me - when you say population it implies they are the same species, just called something different in different areas of the country,...
 

Nomadinexile

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
2,672
Completely different species kathy. Like C. scuplturatus and C. vittatus.
Not the same.


They look the same. Many people are confused. It's really hard to tell. But they are different species.
 

jayefbe

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1,349
See, that does not make sense to me - when you say population it implies they are the same species, just called something different in different areas of the country,...
His post does make it sound as though he's just referring to different populations of the same species, but that's not necessarily the case when talking about populations and it's probably a language barrier issue.
 

BeakerTheMighty

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
101
Centruroides sculpturatus and Centruroides exilicauda are both seperate and currently recognized species. (Fet et al. 2000). My understanding (though honestly I'm not going to go digging through references to verify it right now, so if anyone has any material that contradicts this please post) is that what is commonly called the AZ Bark Scorpion was originally called sculpturatus until being synonimized with the species in Northern Mexico (C. exilicauda) in 1973. So for pretty much anyone who developed an interest in scorpions in the last 35 years, its always been C. exilicauda. However, to complicate things further, in 2004 a study conducted at the National Autonomous University of Mexico on the chemical / dna content of venom from both species showed differences significant enough that the Centruroides species native to AZ was seperated back into it's own species (C. sculpturatus). Simple version at the moment is that Arizona Barks are C. sculpturatus. Centruroides exilicauda still exists in Northern Mexico, but does not incorporate AZ centruroides anymore.
Centruroides species can display a great variety of color variation and morphs, which has made it difficult for taxonomists. There have been a number of other Centruroides "species" that became subspecies or were eliminated as a color morph of what was previously thought to be a separate species. Many revisions have taken place in the genus, and I would be absolutely amazed if this was the last revision we see.
 

Michiel

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
3,478
so the gene pool in arizona are different from california? that doesnt make sense

unless you mean theyre the same minus/plus a few genes
Maybe my statement was incomplete, or I expected you to understand it quicker :D
They are comparable in morphometrics, life history, habitat, but i.e. not in coloration patterns and in genetics. This makes that the specimens from Baja, is regarded as a separate species. If these where the same species, just from different populations, they should be obviously assigned to one species, which is not the case, that's why they have different names, etc etc
At least, this is what I understood of the literature and from people who know about North-American scorps...
 

Widowman10

Arachno WIDOW
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
4,209
anyone ever done any successful cross-breeding to produce viable offspring? wonder if it's been done unknowingly.
 

Kathy

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
853
Are you ready to collect this year Kathy? lol
I'm ready, I've been out looking but have not seen any. Found a baby on my kitchen floor last week though. I am hoping to see a lot less this year since I caught so many last summer. I've had about 10 ppl PM me already to be put on the list. LOL. I'm not ignoring the PM's, I'm just waiting to find some...or....hopefully....not!
 

Cowin8579

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
193
lol how funny. I'm surprised they are in such high demand, although the story behind your situation is pretty funny!
 

redhourglass

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Messages
359
The taxonomic history has a history so lets leave it as is. Very complicated but let us move forward into patterns of diversity and zoogeography.

Another discussion awaits,

Sinc. Chad ;)

Maybe my statement was incomplete, or I expected you to understand it quicker :D
At least, this is what I understood of the literature and from people who know about North-American scorps...
 
Top