Tyler S
Arachnopeon
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2018
- Messages
- 32
Alright, Thanks man.View attachment 287961
This is a photo of one of my latrodectus Hesperus when it was a subadult. They can have that pattern, but I think it’s less common.
all our native widows sans bishopi can have fully intact 'redbacks' as adults.More undeniable proof that North American widow's originated from the Australian redbacks. Due to the present distribution, and the current state of evolution among L. Hesperus, leads me to suspect that L. Hesperus lost it's dorsal stripe when migrating to rockier terrain where it could build safe shelters which protected the dorsal side of the spider from attack, needing only the deep red hour-glass for achromatic responses to be effective since attacks from above would be more likely. It would have to take a few million years for that to evolve into effect. It would not be unfeasible that a few redbacks by miraculous chance, ballooned onto a piece of driftwood or the like and started a separate colony, given how close the two continents would have likely been. The European widow is far too different in patterning to be the original progenitor of the North American widows, but it is possible that it is the progenitor of L. Variolous and L. Bishopi. due to the resemblance of patterning and size in the younger stages of life. It is far more likely that L. Mactans is a split off of L. Hesperus, but that is another conjecture for another time. It would just make sense, being that California is likely where L. Hesperus originated, and spread. Just my two cents. Don't take any of it with a glow of certainty, because I know I'm not certain about it.
So does the Mediterranean/European widow, which I believe is older on the taxonomy chart if I'm not mistaken for reading incorrectly. I believe two separate progenitors produced our beautiful North American widows.all our native widows sans bishopi can have fully intact 'redbacks' as adults.
I had several discussions with the curators at the Darwin museum regarding the connection/migration of Hasselti to N. A. The general opinion is the red back is higher up the Phylogenetic tree and the ancestor species, but with a big problem. So Hasselti hitchhiked over to N.A. somehow, but plate tectonics indicates pre African landmass around India-Madagascar was connected. In turn there was a land bridge between Asia and Australia with the India wolf being the ancestor of the Dingo. So why are there no representatives of Hasselti in India, Madagascar and Africa?Due to the present distribution, and the current state of evolution among L. Hesperus, leads me to suspect that L. Hesperus lost it's dorsal stripe when migrating to rockier terrain where it could build safe shelters which protected the dorsal side of the spider from attack, needing only the deep red hour-glass for achromatic responses to be effective since attacks from above would be more likely.
I had several discussions with the curators at the Darwin museum regarding the connection/migration of Hasselti to N. A. The general opinion is the red back is higher up the Phylogenetic tree and the ancestor species, but with a big problem. So Hasselti hitchhiked over to N.A. somehow, but plate tectonics indicates pre African landmass around India-Madagascar was connected. In turn there was a land bridge between Asia and Australia with the India wolf being the ancestor of the Dingo. So why are these no representatives of Hasselti in India, Madagascar and Africa?
The African species are likely a separate offshoot of latrodectus sp. to those found in presentday austrailia, possibly a more ancient species of latros. These are my theories from reading a couple of well written articles from fellow arachnoboard members, as well as those on the internet.@The Snark Madagascar has latrodectus menavodi, which has a simmilar dorsal pattern to hasselti, but also white dots and red in the front and sides of the abdomen. Africa has plenty of latrodectus species also. I’m not too sure about India, but it’s pososble that pallidus can be found there.
You bring up a good point regarding Katipo. However, I think it’s Katipo which is a descendant of hasselti. Do we know any Australian species which are descended from New Zealand species? I do know that hasselti isn’t thought to have been an Australia wide species. It was thought to originate from a smaller area, and has since expanded into Asia. As for tredecimguttus, it can also be black like Hesperus or indistinctus. I also think that there are species which are unidentified or have incomplete ranges. I saw an Ecuadorian species which looked like a mix of hasselti and mirabilis, and another weird Mexican species.A very thought provoking question indeed. Perhaps the Katipo is the the true progenitor? I know that the Mediterranean Widow looks similar to the red backs and the katipo's, then, that would make the Mediterranean widow the original ancestor to the red backs and katipo's?
I misunderstood the context of this conversation. I realize we are talking about ancestry now. You’re probably correct. I would even go as far to say that all Mediterranean species, African, middle eastern, and possibly Asian species are related. For all we know it could be a similar situation to Loxosceles species.The African species are likely a separate offshoot of latrodectus sp. to those found in presentday austrailia, possibly a more ancient species of latros. These are my theories from reading a couple of well written articles from fellow arachnoboard members, as well as those on the internet.
I misunderstood the context of this conversation. I realize we are talking about ancestry now. You’re probably correct. I would even go as far to say that all Mediterranean species, African, middle eastern, and possibly Asian species are related. For all we know it could be a similar situation to Loxosceles species.
so it was waaay before genus Latrodectus evolvedas Africa and South America split only 120 million years ago.
This thread is getting a bit confusing.
Coloration has basically no importance for deciphering evolutionary relations.
On the scale we are talking here, we cannot say that one recent species is ancestor of another, they may have common ancestor and be sister taxa, but not ancestor/descendant of each other.
Can You guys please post links to the articles You are talking about ? As I only have Garb et al. 2004 and it is not very consistent with this discussion.
so it was waaay before genus Latrodectus evolved