- Joined
- May 1, 2004
- Messages
- 2,290
Found this link this morning via Yahoo's Pet Law list, and decided to post it here. I know that there are many people here who feel that bans on THEIR animals of choice will never happen, anywhere, that no one could conceiveably consider THEIR pets to be "dangerous", so they have the attitude that OTHER people's pets can be tossed under the proverbial bus. I have especially seen that attitude by T/invert keepers that animal bans/restrictions won't apply to them. Well, the US Air Force disagrees. Take a look at the list of animals that they are now banning from bases: http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/09/air-force-puts-more-bite-in-pet-regulations-091811/ . Don't think that it will just stop with the military, folks. A lot of communities have already used the "if the AF thinks they're dangerous, WE will go along with what they say, because it must be so" reasoning to implement their dog breed/type bans.
pitbulllady
pitbulllady