Sexual Dimorphism... Male and female of different species

JenVegas

Arachnosquire
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
64
So I've been really interested in sexual dimorphism recently, particularly how different it is in different species.

Some have obvious sexual dimorphism that you can see at a glance, others are much, much harder.

In some, the male is bigger. Others, the female is bigger. In some, the female is noticeably chunkier than the male, in others, they're the same size.

It's so interesting for me to scroll through a bunch of the old "sexing help" posts of different species. Because there's not always a ton of info out there.

And even after looking at the few pictures I could find, I still thought my first scorp was a male until someone here explained the difference to me.

So I'm wondering if we could make a thread that shows the sexual dimorphism of each species, to help people better determine the sex of their scorpions.

The only species I have experience with is one that has obvious sexual dimorphism, but even so, I was confused at first, so on the offchance someone else gets them and is also confused, I figured I'd write out the differences.

Centruroides Sculpturatus

Males are longer and thinner, while females are heavier and bulkier.

Males have long, thin, almost twiggy-looking tails, while females have shorter, slightly thicker tails. Males have slightly larger chela and pedipalps.

Males have longer, larger pectines, with a count between 20-35. Females have shorter pectines, with a count between 18 and 25. On males, you can often see the pectines sticking out from the sides, even when looking from the top down, but this isn't a guarantee.

IMG_20200902_091626.jpg
Top: male
Bottom: female

IMG_20200902_091937.jpg
Top: male
Bottom: female

IMG_20200902_091710.jpg
Left: male
Right: female

IMG_20200902_091807.jpg
Right: male, 24 pectines
Left: female, 21 pectines
Even though the number is similar, the male's pectines are noticeably larger and more pronounced.

20200831_015526.jpg
Male on top, female on bottom

20200902_090238.jpg
Male on left, female on right. Both have a visible pectine from the side, but it is much more pronounced on the male.

20200824_101319.jpg
Same male and female, closer together.

20200824_101625.jpg
Same male and female, resting in almost identical positions. Again, one of his pectines is visible, and the size difference in pedipalp/chela is more noticeable. Though he is longer, she is larger in terms of weight and bulk.

20200829_164401.jpg
Tail length in males is long enough to easily reach forward without needing to bend or curl the body.

20200830_021458.jpg
Tail length in females is shorter, and females often curl their bodies or raise the rear part of their abdomen to extend the telson and aculeus farther.

Behaviorally, males are faster, more agile, and more active. While I commonly see both males and females climb, males tend to be slightly better at it.

Females are slower and "lazier," but will often bask outside of their hide (ie, you see them more, while males tend to stay hidden). They are significantly more aggressive, and more eager feeders. I've noticed that males tend to be picky and shy eaters, while females often readily devour anything that moves.

I've seen a study showing that females of a similar species, C. Vittatus, are more likely to sting in defense than males. When threatened, males tend to use their superior agility and speed to escape, while females are more likely to stand and fight.

This has also been observed in C. Sculpturatus. Females are more likely to sting defensively, and their larger overall size and weight means that they inject more venom (though when adjusted for body weight, both males and females of C. Vittatus were found to inject similar amounts of venom).

Because this is a medically significant species, defensiveness and likelihood to sting may need to be taken into account. Though neither males nor females of this species should ever be handled.
 

Dr SkyTower

Arachnolord
Joined
Dec 21, 2019
Messages
660
this is a fabulous idea. It would be great to see some other species too, the sexual dimorphism is quite pronounced (ie hadrogenes), yet in others they basically look the same (heterometrus - except for longimanus where the males have extremely long pointy fingers on the pedipalps and the females have normal looking pedipalp hands). The easiest way to tell centruroides apart is by tail length. In some (parabuthus villosus) they look alike and the only way to tell them apart without counting pectine feathers! Is the size of the pedipalp hands - males have fat bulbous hands and females have thin hands.
 

GordoOldman

Arachnoknight
Active Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
223
This could be a very neat thread indeed. Again, the enthusiasm and passion can not help but be notices and make anyone reading smile.

If I may offer an edit suggestion in regard to your post to help enhance, the count is of pectine teeth and not pectines...imagine 24 pectines on a scorpion :) it would look like a millipede...only cooler!

Keep up the posts, I enjoy them. I will put one or two together so that I am contributing.
 

JenVegas

Arachnosquire
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
64
This could be a very neat thread indeed. Again, the enthusiasm and passion can not help but be notices and make anyone reading smile.

If I may offer an edit suggestion in regard to your post to help enhance, the count is of pectine teeth and not pectines...imagine 24 pectines on a scorpion :) it would look like a millipede...only cooler!

Keep up the posts, I enjoy them. I will put one or two together so that I am contributing.
Oh oops. Although man, that would look so cool!
 

GordoOldman

Arachnoknight
Active Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
223
The sexual dimorphism of scorpions is quite an interesting study all on its own.
Many of the dimorphic attributes are easier to see, the lengthening of metasomal segments, telson size and shape differences, longer legs, size and shape of the chelae...then there are differences that take a bit more investigation...the pectines themselves are utilized in sexual determination due to the often strongly sexually dimorphic expressions in a vast number of species. From the size, shape, length of the spine and teeth of the pectines, to the tooth counts of each pectine. Chelicerae too can have dimorphic expressions in many species, but due to difficulty to observe is not the most useful diagnostic tool for hobbyists.

Many investigations looking into biological and ecological pressures for sexual dimorphism exist, many of the papers written are worth the time to search for and read.

As time allows I will contribute some detailed species specific accounts. Until then I attach some examples of sexually dimorphic traits.

Hadogenes species present some of my favorite examples, like this pair of H. troglodytes. The utilization of stinging in courtship is important for this group, a compressed body for living in narrow crevices and cracks, the males ability to extend the metasoma and telson around the side to the female is achieved by the great lengthening seen in the males metasomal segments.

Centruroides sculpturatus started this thread (thanks JenVegas) so I attach images of an adult male, and adult female of the "gertschi" phenotype. The longer legs of a male, the lengthened metasomal segments, the chelae shape and length, and the telson length and shape differences are all easily seen.

As mentioned above with the "gertschi" C. sculpturatus, the telson shape itself is a very useful and easily spotted sexually dimorphic trait in many species. This adult pair of Vaejovis sp. clearly shows that shape difference (male left, female right) this is a sexually mature adult pair next to a nickel for size...needless to say the telson differences are easier to visbly determine than pectine differences in a species so diminutive.
 

Attachments

Top