Sex my p. metallica sling (pretty clear pics)

robc

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
3,797
My P. metallica sling molted again and is about 2" (little under)....I would like other opinions. Got the clearest shot I could...it was through acrylic.



 

Richard McJimsey

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
1,748
For sure male. I wonder why so many people said female in the last metallica sexing thread you made :?
 

Satellite Rob

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
927
I've been doing this for a long time and what makes me think it's a males is
the possitioning of the anterior book lungs.Thay extend quite a bit past the
epigastric furrow.Please excuse my spelling.But i think i spelled it right.It just
looks wrong.
 

Sukai94

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
336
Those are some great pictures! What camera did you use?
 

Paramite

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
1,183
For sure male. I wonder why so many people said female in the last metallica sexing thread you made :?
Umm, because it looked very much like a female.

This settles it. I'm no longer trying to sex Pokies under 2".
 

jbm150

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
1,649
Just curious, how do you sex a pokie that is a little under 2" and say that it is "100% male"? It still is to young imo...
I was wondering the same thing. I am decent once they get a bit larger, but with this one, I didn't know what to look for. Thanks SatelliteRob for that explanation
 

cityzooguy

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
62
affordable??

you on a mission to make these things affordable rob? is your plan to breed like 15 females (I hope)?

if so that would be awesome:worship: !!
 

BCscorp

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,124
I am going female too. why?
the patch above the furrow is squarish rather than pointed and it lacks the little dark patch of hairs at the bottom of the square patch (right above the furrow). And the upper (anterior) book lungs are set far apart.
The only thing that it lacks for me (other than size) to say female for sure is that the furrow is not very pronounced...yet.
I am more comfortable sexing like this with bigger specimen, but I am thinking female.
 
Last edited:

UrbanJungles

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
1,124
Sexing metallicas is relatively easy, it has nothing to do with book lung placement or even epiandrous fusillae.

It's much easier to tell when they are slightly larger but you can consistently sex (metallica only) them by looking at the epigastric furrow...in females it's usually a straight slit accross, males will have a little "notch" "arrow" or "triangle" in the center of the furrow.
 

JC

Arachnolort
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
1,419
you on a mission to make these things affordable rob? is your plan to breed like 15 females (I hope)?

if so that would be awesome:worship: !!
Maybe we should start a a charity for Rob {D
 

robc

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
3,797
Sexing metallicas is relatively easy, it has nothing to do with book lung placement or even epiandrous fusillae.

It's much easier to tell when they are slightly larger but you can consistently sex (metallica only) them by looking at the epigastric furrow...in females it's usually a straight slit accross, males will have a little "notch" "arrow" or "triangle" in the center of the furrow.
That is very good info!!:clap:
 

robc

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
3,797
you on a mission to make these things affordable rob? is your plan to breed like 15 females (I hope)?

if so that would be awesome:worship: !!
I will have at least 6-8 females by the end of the year.
 
Top