Scorpion Incubator/Surrogate Initial Observations

MorbidArachnid

Arachnoknight
Active Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
195
So back in February I ran into some brood trouble with my Hottentotta hottentotta. I posted about it here: https://arachnoboards.com/threads/scorpion-breeding-troubles.366745/

The gist of it was most of the brood didn't make it onto her back, and the ones that did quickly fell off over the next day or so. To attempt to save them, I used the "cloth over substrate" method that is commonly used to incubate tarantula egg sacs. Both this method and the next method I used were introduced to me in "Scorpions" by Jeroen Kooijman. Link to Book Here

1721038356642.png 1721038372098.png

You can see in the second picture not all of them escaped the envelope either, I didn't know if I could remove it safely. The incubator consisted of a 32oz vented deli cup, such as the kind that would be used to culture fruit flies. It was filled partially with moist substrate, and the cloth was slightly wetted. The initial brood was on Feb 8th, but by Feb 16th they had all died. As an aside, this same Hottentotta had her second brood on July 8th, and by July 12th I have 21 off and separated successfully.

On June 25th my second Paravaejovis spinigerus started giving birth. The first spingerus, which was kept in almost the exact same way, had 60 babies that were separated off without any issues. She was also immediately having trouble, because while the first spinigerus had a very large brood, the second spinigerus had maybe 5-7 babies total, most of whom ended up on the ground. She ended with only 3 babies on her back, and was unusual in that I could still see embryos in her. I left her, assuming she would continue to give birth later, but she never did (and still to this day hasn't, I don't think I can see embryos still so I assume she absorbed them or expelled and ate them without me noticing). The 3 babies gradually declined and fell off, until I found the last one still alive in the substrate. For this one, I tried the second method, scorpion surrogacy. She was moved onto a surrogate on July 4th, making 9 days on the mother's back.

1721039080087.png
For this method I used a plastic scorpion, keep the substrate very moist and lightly misted the deli cup.
1721039140238.png
On July 5th, she successfully molted to 2i and is doing well and eating as of today.

My Centruroides vittatus brood ran into similar problems, she gave birth and had babies on her back, but upon molting to 2i, they had all fallen off and died. Then, just a few days later, I found her with 4 more babies on her back. This is was made me believe the spinigerus might finish giving birth after her initial brood was removed. The secondary brood declined much more quickly though, two of the babies disappeared (presumably eaten) right away, and about 5 days later I found the remaining two on the cork bark. I moved them to the surrogate, set up in a similar way.
1721039601598.png
They were moved to the surrogate on July 6th, and on July 10th they had both molted to 2i. One of them however was extremely weak after the molt and died shortly after.

1721039751111.png 1721039775377.png

Some notes, further questions, and explorations:

The Hottentotta brood probably wouldn't have been successful on the surrogate anyway because they had fallen off almost immediately. I would assume more time with mom gives the pullus more chance of survival. Of the two methods, the surrogate definitely seems more successful, the cloth had trouble maintaining the correct moisture level and the pullus were constantly moving and climbing over each other, which no doubt contributed to their deaths. I don't know how long a pullus has to be with it's mother to have a reasonable chance of survival on the surrogate, nor how long they can survive on the surrogate for species that have a longer period between being born and molting to 2i. I would be interested to see this tried in a Heterometrus or Pandinus species. Obviously this is still a last ditch effort, and I'm not sure what the survival rate would be with a larger group as opposed to just the 3 I tried it with. It's also interesting to note that all three did molt successfully, though only 2 survived beyond that. The other thing I would like to note is that while on the cloth the Hottentotta were very active, both the spinigerus and vittatus hardly moved at all while on the surrogate, and even seemed for the most part to orient themselves as they would on their mom. It seems it's a close enough replacement that they think they're on their mothers, and so don't attempt to move around to seek her out. I also don't know if being on the surrogate affects their long term health, I plan on monitoring them over time to see if they make it through molts successfully, or have something that affects their health and causes them to not thrive and grow. Again these are just initial observations, if anyone else is in a situation where they have to try this I'm curious what the outcome is.
 

darkness975

Latrodectus
Arachnosupporter +
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
6,020
So back in February I ran into some brood trouble with my Hottentotta hottentotta. I posted about it here: https://arachnoboards.com/threads/scorpion-breeding-troubles.366745/

The gist of it was most of the brood didn't make it onto her back, and the ones that did quickly fell off over the next day or so. To attempt to save them, I used the "cloth over substrate" method that is commonly used to incubate tarantula egg sacs. Both this method and the next method I used were introduced to me in "Scorpions" by Jeroen Kooijman. Link to Book Here

View attachment 478319 View attachment 478320

You can see in the second picture not all of them escaped the envelope either, I didn't know if I could remove it safely. The incubator consisted of a 32oz vented deli cup, such as the kind that would be used to culture fruit flies. It was filled partially with moist substrate, and the cloth was slightly wetted. The initial brood was on Feb 8th, but by Feb 16th they had all died. As an aside, this same Hottentotta had her second brood on July 8th, and by July 12th I have 21 off and separated successfully.

On June 25th my second Paravaejovis spinigerus started giving birth. The first spingerus, which was kept in almost the exact same way, had 60 babies that were separated off without any issues. She was also immediately having trouble, because while the first spinigerus had a very large brood, the second spinigerus had maybe 5-7 babies total, most of whom ended up on the ground. She ended with only 3 babies on her back, and was unusual in that I could still see embryos in her. I left her, assuming she would continue to give birth later, but she never did (and still to this day hasn't, I don't think I can see embryos still so I assume she absorbed them or expelled and ate them without me noticing). The 3 babies gradually declined and fell off, until I found the last one still alive in the substrate. For this one, I tried the second method, scorpion surrogacy. She was moved onto a surrogate on July 4th, making 9 days on the mother's back.

View attachment 478321
For this method I used a plastic scorpion, keep the substrate very moist and lightly misted the deli cup.
View attachment 478322
On July 5th, she successfully molted to 2i and is doing well and eating as of today.

My Centruroides vittatus brood ran into similar problems, she gave birth and had babies on her back, but upon molting to 2i, they had all fallen off and died. Then, just a few days later, I found her with 4 more babies on her back. This is was made me believe the spinigerus might finish giving birth after her initial brood was removed. The secondary brood declined much more quickly though, two of the babies disappeared (presumably eaten) right away, and about 5 days later I found the remaining two on the cork bark. I moved them to the surrogate, set up in a similar way.
View attachment 478323
They were moved to the surrogate on July 6th, and on July 10th they had both molted to 2i. One of them however was extremely weak after the molt and died shortly after.

View attachment 478324 View attachment 478325

Some notes, further questions, and explorations:

The Hottentotta brood probably wouldn't have been successful on the surrogate anyway because they had fallen off almost immediately. I would assume more time with mom gives the pullus more chance of survival. Of the two methods, the surrogate definitely seems more successful, the cloth had trouble maintaining the correct moisture level and the pullus were constantly moving and climbing over each other, which no doubt contributed to their deaths. I don't know how long a pullus has to be with it's mother to have a reasonable chance of survival on the surrogate, nor how long they can survive on the surrogate for species that have a longer period between being born and molting to 2i. I would be interested to see this tried in a Heterometrus or Pandinus species. Obviously this is still a last ditch effort, and I'm not sure what the survival rate would be with a larger group as opposed to just the 3 I tried it with. It's also interesting to note that all three did molt successfully, though only 2 survived beyond that. The other thing I would like to note is that while on the cloth the Hottentotta were very active, both the spinigerus and vittatus hardly moved at all while on the surrogate, and even seemed for the most part to orient themselves as they would on their mom. It seems it's a close enough replacement that they think they're on their mothers, and so don't attempt to move around to seek her out. I also don't know if being on the surrogate affects their long term health, I plan on monitoring them over time to see if they make it through molts successfully, or have something that affects their health and causes them to not thrive and grow. Again these are just initial observations, if anyone else is in a situation where they have to try this I'm curious what the outcome is.
That is truly fascinating.
 

Diao

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jun 22, 2003
Messages
228
Awesome to see you had at least one success with this method. I've seen the fake surrogate mother done with a Cheloctonus brood where the mother died immediately after giving birth, and the brood was successfully transplanted from her back to the surrogate and then raised around the surrogate then after as well. My guess would be that the broods you were dealing with would have most likely had a poor survival rate from jump, regardless of husbandry. So just the fact that you had any molts/survivals is a testament to your setup and care. Awesome work, keep us updated!
 

darkness975

Latrodectus
Arachnosupporter +
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
6,020
The fact that the surrogate is not alive sparks curiosity for me. The babies have to know it's not a living animal but they stayed anyway. It must have more to do with the security of the location. Nature has them programmed to stay until their molt.
 

MorbidArachnid

Arachnoknight
Active Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
195
The fact that the surrogate is not alive sparks curiosity for me. The babies have to know it's not a living animal but they stayed anyway. It must have more to do with the security of the location. Nature has them programmed to stay until their molt.
What's interesting is when on the substrate, they do seem to move around to try to find their mom again. Clearly there's something they're looking for, and for whatever reason the plastic seems to be good enough that they stay put. I think i remember reading an article about them introducing the pullus to a different scorpion of the same species, but they didn't stay on her back either, which is why the author thought there was some sort of chemical signaling going on. That's a big <citation needed> though because I forgot where I read that.
 
Top